8171 results found

1. Setting Folder Autodelete via API

   The automatic deletion date of a folder can be set from the web screen, but it seems that it cannot be set from the API.

   Could you please provide the ability to set this date from the API?

   We have a process that automatically creates thousands of folders using the API, but since it is not possible to set an automatic deletion date, a large number of past folders will continue to remain.

   44 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   researching  ·  0 comments  ·  Developer Platform  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Content owners to be searchable even if they own more than 1 million items

   Currently, Box's search function becomes unstable when the owner of the content you want to check owns more than 1 million pieces of content,
   making it impossible to hit the file correctly. It takes a huge amount of time to check the number of contents of the owner of the content to be confirmed each time in order to perform a file search correctly,
   which affects business operations. Please improve the search function so that it can be used correctly even if the content you want to check has more than 1 million owners

   (日本語)
   現在Boxの検索機能は確認されたいコンテンツの所有者が100万コンテンツ以上所有している場合、ファイル検索の動作が不安定になり正常にヒットできません。
   正しくファイル検索を行う為に確認されたいコンテンツの所有者のコンテンツ数を都度確認するのは膨大な時間がかかり業務に影響がございます。
   確認されたいコンテンツの所有者が100万以上所有されていても正しく検索機能が使えるよう機能改善をお願いします。

   Currently, Box's search function becomes unstable when the owner of the content you want to check owns more than 1 million pieces of content,
   making it impossible to hit the file correctly. It takes a huge amount of time to check the number of contents of the owner of the content to be confirmed each time in order to perform a file search correctly,
   which affects business operations. Please improve the search function so that it can be used correctly even if the content you want to check has more than 1 million owners

   (日本語)
   現在Boxの検索機能は確認されたいコンテンツの所有者が100万コンテンツ以上所有している場合、ファイル検索の動作が不安定になり正常にヒットできません。
   正しくファイル検索を行う為に確認されたいコンテンツの所有者のコンテンツ数を都度確認するのは膨大な時間がかかり業務に影響がございます。… more

   31 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   researching  ·  0 comments  ·  Search  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. We want users to be able to output a "folder and file" report for each folder.

   (Japanese follows English)
   Currently, only administrators can output the "Folders and Files" report.
   We would like users with editor permissions for the target folder to be able to output a "Folder and File" report for each folder.
   At that time, We would like to be able to select whether the report will be output to that folder or the output destination.

   現在、「フォルダとファイル」レポートは管理者しか出力できません。
   対象のフォルダに対し編集者権限を持つユーザーが、フォルダ単位で「フォルダとファイル」レポートを
   出力できるようにしてほしいです。
   その際レポートの出力先はそのフォルダ内か、出力先を選択できると望ましいです。

   22 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Want to be able to specify the number of times each user uses BoxAI

   Want to be able to specify the number of times each user uses BoxAI

   Box AI can currently limit the number of users who use it, but it is not possible to limit the number of times it can be used.
   This is very inconvenient. I would like to be able to specify users who can only use Box AI up to 20 times, or specify users who can use Box AI more than 20 times.

   BoxAIのユーザーごとの利用回数を指定できるようにしたい

   Box AIは、現状利用するユーザーを制限することはできますが、利用回数を制限することが出来ません。
   これは非常に不便です。20回までしかBox AIを利用出来ないユーザーを指定、または20回以上利用出来るユーザーを指定出来るようにしたいです。

   29 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   researching  ·  0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. 【New UI】 Ability to limit authorization settings by co-administrators.

   After the change to the new UI, co-administrators are no longer able to grant or revoke co-administrator privileges to other users for security reasons.
   Some users have voiced a lack of convenience because they are no longer able to do things that were previously possible with co-administrator authority.
   We would like to see a restriction feature added to allow operation only by some co-administrators.

   新UIに変更後、セキュリティ強化の観点から共同管理者では他ユーザーに対し共同管理者権限の付与や剥奪の操作が行えなくなっています。
   これまで共同管理者権限で実施出来ていたことが出来なくなっているため利便性が欠けている声が上がっている。
   一部の共同管理者のみ操作を可能にする制限機能を追加してほしいです。

   34 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   under consideration  ·  0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. About recycle bin settings for Enterprise

   The Recycle Bin settings for Enterprise can be customized, but only users below the specified role can completely delete the contents in the Recycle Bin.

   All users (including automation and policies)
   None (content cannot be deleted by user or policy)
   Policy only (users cannot delete content)
   Admin only
   Administrators and co-admins only
   selected user

   Items that meet the retention policy are set to be permanently deleted.
   However, there may be cases where a managed user accidentally uploads unnecessary files to Box. At that time, the administrator would like to delete the subject item completely.

   Therefore, in addition to the above, we would like to see an improvement to allow full deletion by "administrator or policy".

   ■日本語
   件名：ごみ箱の完全に削除できるユーザの設定について
   内容：
   Enterprise用のごみ箱の設定をカスタマイズできるが、ごみ箱内のコンテンツを完全に削除できるのは指定したロールの以下ユーザーだけとなっている。

   すべてのユーザー (自動化とポリシーを含む)
   なし (ユーザー、ポリシーによるコンテンツ削除不可)
   ポリシーのみ (ユーザーによるコンテンツ削除不可)
   管理者のみ
   管理者および共同管理者のみ
   選択したユーザー

   リテンションポリシーに合致したアイテムが完全削除されるよう設定をしてしようしています。
   しかし、管理対象ユーザが誤ってBoxに不要なファイルをアップロードするケースが考えられる。
   その際に管理者にて対象アイテムの完全削除を行いたいです。

   そのため、上記に加えて、”管理者もしくはポリシー”による完全削除ができるように改善してほしい。

   The Recycle Bin settings for Enterprise can be customized, but only users below the specified role can completely delete the contents in the Recycle Bin.

   All users (including automation and policies)
   None (content cannot be deleted by user or policy)
   Policy only (users cannot delete content)
   Admin only
   Administrators and co-admins only
   selected user

   Items that meet the retention policy are set to be permanently deleted.
   However, there may be cases where a managed user accidentally uploads unnecessary files to Box. At that time, the administrator would like to delete the subject item completely.

   Therefore, in addition to the… more

   20 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Other  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Ability to tie one BoxEID to a specific microsoft365 tenant.

   When I add and activate Microsoft Power Automate to the Box app, it can be linked to multiple microsoft365 tenants.
   We would like BoxEID to be linked to a microsoft365 tenant and only be available in specific environments.

   In Japanese:
   Microsoft Power AutomateをBoxのアプリに追加して有効化すると、
   複数のmicrosoft365テナントと連携ができてしまいます。
   BoxEIDとmicrosoft365テナントを結び付けて、特定環境でのみ利用ができるようにしてほしいです。

   21 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Box App Center  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Automatically add date to Sign request

   Currently, you need to manually add the date field to a sign request. The date field should automatically be added to all sign requests given the date information is always needed with a signature.

   35 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   2 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Auto Classification policy does not work when folders are copied or moved

   We would like to improve the behavior so that the auto-classification policy works correctly for files within the folder, even if the folder is copied or moved.

   【Details】
   Currently, the Auto Classification policy works correctly when files are copied or moved, but not when folders are copied or moved.
   For example, if a ".dwg" file is stored in the "Technical Information" folder, there is an automatic classification policy that assigns the label "Technical Information" (not for external collaboration).
   In this case, when a file with a .dwg extension is moved from the "Outside Shared" folder, it is automatically assigned the label "TECHNICAL INFOMATION".
   On the other hand, moving a folder containing files with a .dwg extension does not change the classification label of the files in the folder. As a result, at least once, an external user can preview or download the file.

   This may be a behavior specification rather than a defect, but it is problematic behavior for business requirements.
   We would like to see a fix that would allow the automatic classification policy to work on folder-by-folder moves and copies and automatically change the restrictions on important files within a folder.

   (I accidentally deleted a previous Pulse with the same content, so I'm reposting it. Sorry for the inconvenience.)

   We would like to improve the behavior so that the auto-classification policy works correctly for files within the folder, even if the folder is copied or moved.

   【Details】
   Currently, the Auto Classification policy works correctly when files are copied or moved, but not when folders are copied or moved.
   For example, if a ".dwg" file is stored in the "Technical Information" folder, there is an automatic classification policy that assigns the label "Technical Information" (not for external collaboration).
   In this case, when a file with a .dwg extension is moved from the "Outside Shared" folder, it is automatically assigned the… more

   31 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   not planned  ·  AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) responded

   Unfortunately classifying child items upon move/copy operations of the parent folder is not being considered at this time.

10. Dynamically name signed documents based on metadata: signer's full name, company, email and others

    When there are documents in the same folder or templates that are repeatably signed with the same name (Ready Sign Link, Batch Send), Box Sign adds a number and () to the filename to note the different/unique files.

    There needs to be a better way to name the files - perhaps using metadata or using the unique id of the sign request. And then all files - signed docs and signed log would be renamed with the same name. Otherwise it's very hard to tell files apart when they all have the same name with just a number and () in them

    When there are documents in the same folder or templates that are repeatably signed with the same name (Ready Sign Link, Batch Send), Box Sign adds a number and () to the filename to note the different/unique files.

    There needs to be a better way to name the files - perhaps using metadata or using the unique id of the sign request. And then all files - signed docs and signed log would be renamed with the same name. Otherwise it's very hard to tell files apart when they all have the same name with just a number and ()… more

    72 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    gathering feedback  ·  AdminRoman Shevtsov (Product Manager, Box) responded

    We see a lot of value in this request and our team is gathering feedback and additional use cases regarding this suggestion. 

    Please add your comments and support this suggestion so we can prioritize it accordingly. What metadata would you use and what file name format/naming convention you use today?

11. Increase Keynote collaboration size limit to match Apples.

    Apples iCloud offers users a 2GB Keynote collaboration limit.
    Please can Box match this limit we are struggling with the 1GB limit with users reverting back to iCloud.

    14 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Tools  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. IP address restriction setting in admin console

    We would like to be able to configure IP address restriction setting in admin console.
    It cannot be set up IP address restriction without a service request to product support.
    Therefore, any customer have to wait long time to set it and also is inconvenient.

    14 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. We would like the usage standards for Box Connector for Microsoft Graph to be relaxed.

    Currently, the Box Connector for Microsoft Graph requires fewer than 10,000 Box users, but the improved interoperability between Box and Microsoft products is more beneficial for larger tenants.
    I would like the user limit to be increased or eliminated.

    Additionally, We can currently search and display Box content (up to 20,000 recent items) across the Microsoft ecosystem, but this amount of content is not very searchable, so we'd like to see as many as possible.

    https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/4403605037587-Box-Graph-Connector

    Box Connector for Microsoft Graphの利用基準を緩和してほしい

    現在、Box Connector for Microsoft Graphを利用するにはBoxユーザーが10,000人未満であることが条件ですが、Box製品とMicrosoft製品間の相互運用性の向上は、大人数のテナントでより効果的です。
    ユーザー数の上限を引き上げるか、なくしてほしいです。

    また現在は、Microsoftのエコシステム全体でBoxのコンテンツ (最大20,000の最新項目) を検索して表示できますが、このコンテンツ数では検索性が低いため、可能な限り多くしてほしいです。

    https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/4403605037587-Box-Graph-Connector

    10 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Please implement the ability for Admins to specify the folder to export to when exporting a report.

    In the course of our work, we sometimes share reports exported by Admin to users.
    Currently, this is handled by inviting users as viewers to the exported reports (folders).
    However, due to the need to share reports on a regular basis, a huge number of report folders are currently displayed on the user's "All Files" screen.
    These folders are expected to continue to grow, and users are already finding Box very difficult to use at this time.

    Please implement the ability for Admins to specify the folder to export to when exporting a report.

    業務の上で、管理者が出力したレポートをユーザーに共有することがあります。
    現在は出力されたレポート(フォルダ)にユーザーをビューアーとして招待して対応しています。
    しかし、定期的にレポートの共有が必要なため、現在は膨大な数のレポートフォルダがユーザーのすべてのファイル直下に表示されています。
    これらのフォルダはこのまま増え続ける見込みで、ユーザーは現時点で既にBoxを大変利用しづらい状況となっています。

    管理者がレポートを出力する際に、出力先フォルダを指定できるようにしてください。

    In the course of our work, we sometimes share reports exported by Admin to users.
    Currently, this is handled by inviting users as viewers to the exported reports (folders).
    However, due to the need to share reports on a regular basis, a huge number of report folders are currently displayed on the user's "All Files" screen.
    These folders are expected to continue to grow, and users are already finding Box very difficult to use at this time.

    Please implement the ability for Admins to specify the folder to export to when exporting a report.

    業務の上で、管理者が出力したレポートをユーザーに共有することがあります。
    現在は出力されたレポート(フォルダ)にユーザーをビューアーとして招待して対応しています。
    しかし、定期的にレポートの共有が必要なため、現在は膨大な数のレポートフォルダがユーザーのすべてのファイル直下に表示されています。
    これらのフォルダはこのまま増え続ける見込みで、ユーザーは現時点で既にBoxを大変利用しづらい状況となっています。

    … more

    19 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Admin Reports  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Make docuworks files compatible with Box AI

    富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション社のdocuworksファイル（xdw）を対応してほしい

    I would like Fujifilm Business Innovation's docuworks file (xdw) to be supported.

    12 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box AI  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Allow viewing of multi-page TIFF documents in mobile apps

    We would like support for viewing multi-page Tiff documents beyond the second page in mobile apps, similar to what is already available in the web browser.

    14 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Mobile  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Apply classification labels with move/copy operations to folders as well.

    ■Apply classification labels with move/copy operations to folders as well.

    The current classification label assignment is checked against the events for the files in the Box.

    When there are multiple files that need to be moved/copied, it is time-consuming to specify each file individually, and the folders to move/copy to become cumbersome.
    Therefore, we would like to apply the current behavior to folders as well.

    ■移動/コピー操作を伴う分類ラベルの付与をフォルダにも適用する

    現在の分類ラベルの付与は、 Box 内のファイルに対するイベントに対してチェックがなされます。

    移動/コピー操作が必要なファイルが複数存在する場合、個別に指定して操作する手間が生じたり、
    移動/コピー先のフォルダが煩雑になってしまい業務効率の低下が生じます。
    そのため、現在の動作をフォルダにも適用することを希望します。

    23 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. External collaboration Allow list per group

    We would like to limit the external collaboration to allowed domains for a specific group not the entire tenant.
    This is useful when the subsidiary company, especially a financial company, can have a limited external collaboration for security reason.

    100 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    gathering feedback  ·  1 comment  ·  Admin Console  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Content Insights reports cannot be output if there are restrictions on content creation.

    (Japanese follows English)
    There is a function to export Content Insights access statistics, but if you restrict content creation and prohibit the creation of first-level folders, you will not be able to export it.
    Currently, there are many cases in which system administrators are required to respond to requests, which places a heavy burden on both administrators and users, and hinders the use of content insights.
    Please enable output even in tenants that have restrictions on content creation, such as specifying the report output destination or outputting to a local file.

    ---

    コンテンツ作成の制限が入っているとコンテンツインサイトのレポートが出力出来ない

    コンテンツインサイトのアクセス統計情報をエクスポートという機能がありますが、コンテンツ作成の制限をして第一レベルのフォルダの作成を禁止している場合は出力ができません。
    現状だとシステム管理者に依頼を受けて対応するケースが多く、管理者、利用者とも負荷が大きく、コンテンツインサイトの活用の阻害となっています。
    レポートの出力先を指定する、ローカルにファイル出力するなどコンテンツ作成の制限が入っているテナントでも出力できるようにしてください。

    19 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Web App  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Enable/Disable Part11 compliant BoxSign per request

    Request to add the functionality to enable/disable Part11 compliant feature per e-sigunature request.

    BoxSignのリクエスト毎にPart11機能のON/OFFを切り替えることができる機能を追加してほしい

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Box Sign  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close