Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
176 results found
-
Special characters searchable in content manager
The ability to search with the filename and extension within quotes, i.e. workshop.one
Right now search separates the two and makes it difficult to locate the file, as it would be searching for "workshop one"
3 votes -
Moved to trash report
We would like to run a report for a user and understand who deleted their content. Currently you will need to run this for the whole enterprise with the option moved to trash, and the results will only show who deleted the content and not who owns that content.
The only work around at moment is to pivot table with files and folders report of the owner they are looking to run the report on.
11 votes -
1 vote
-
Ability for permissioned end user (i.e. Liaisons) to assign the policy/write policy for specific business needs with ease
(i.e. one-step/right click)
1 voteMarking as “not planned” pending additional detail. Thanks!
-
Identify "retention policy" as the deleter of content
When an item is deleted by a retention policy, it just reads that "someone" deleted the item.
We would like the ability for the deleter to be named as something more explanatory like "retention policy" so it is more easily identifiable during an audit.
7 votes -
2 votes
-
Ability to exclude specific folders or files from policies
Ability for admin to select folders or files for which subsequent uploads will not be requarantined.
1 vote -
Have a download policy similar to the upload policy
When someone is downloading content with social security numbers, EINs, tax numbers, etc. then someone is notified
1 vote -
Add ability to query if a user is under Legal Hold via API
Currently, Legal Hold objects have assignments, and if you get information about the assignments via the API you could see if a user was assigned to them.
However, we want to access it from the user perspective - something like an islegalheld field on the user object.
2 votes -
Include link to folder/file shared in admin email notification for sharing policies
Currently, the email notification for a sharing policy only shows who sent the collaboration invite and to whom rather than showing the content that was shared. This requires an admin to pull a collaboration report each time to verify what was shared.
1 vote -
2 votes
Thank you for the suggestion! At the moment there is no plan for this feature. We may look into this in the future.
-
Collaboration Domain Whitelisting at Folder Level
We want to whitelist other domains at the folder level so that collaboration can be open with certain clients on external folders while also being completely blocking collaboration with any other domains.
11 votes -
File Version treats each version as a separate file.
Within the policies area box is restoring the file but every time a new version is created the same file will be flagged again.
1 vote -
Apply retention policy to all existing content
Currently with Governance, you have the ability to apply a retention policy to all new content. This policy does not touch any of the existing content within the domain. This is a large issue for an enterprise that wants to apply a single retention policy to the entire domain.
9 votes -
1 vote
-
3 votes
-
The ability to limit the options for extending the retention period
We only want content to live in Box for a set period of time and want to limit the ability for content owners to extend retention after period is up.
1 voteThis is currently not on the roadmap as we have not heard this request from many other customers. We will consider it in the future if there is increased customer demand.
-
Restrict the move to the trash in Retention and Legal Holds
Currently, Retention and Legal Holds prevent contents from deleting them permanently, but it's more helpful to let contents not to move to the trash. We would like to choose from either option. ion.
11 votesThis is an understandable request, but if fulfilled, would create a situation where users had no way of removing files from view.
-
Apply disposition action based on "Move" date
We would like to move active projects to a completed projects folder that deletes content after 30 days.
The disposition action should occur 30 days after the project is closed and the folder is moved, rather than when the files were initially uploaded or last edited.
We cannot apply a policy to the active folder because we need to be able to delete files.
4 votes -
Collaboration Whitelisting - Add Ability to Whitelist Specific External Users
The Collaboration Whitelist feature is currently scoped to whitelist entire domains
REQUEST: Take this current domain whitelisting a level deeper by only allowing certain users from a given domain to collaborate with ones own EID, aka introduce user-level external collaboration whitelisting controls to where a company can say "block all collaboration with all @acme.com users except for X @acme.com users"
19 votesNo plans at this time to make this more granular – while we’re interested in this one, to make this feature work well there is a decent amount of UI complexity to sort through on both the admin and end-user side.
- Don't see your idea?