Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
217 results found
-
Shared Link Expiration (Exception) Settings at Folder Level
I need to be able to control the shared link expiration rules at the folder level, especially when they are an exception from the enterprise-wise rule. We have a handful of use cases that fall outside of the top-line structure, and updating links 1-by-1 is added workflow time on the team. Changing for all assets under a folder would save time and impact when links expired by accident or stay live beyond desired timeline.
2 votes -
Scope of Access Policy Application
We request Shield Access Policy Settings to be applied in the external tenant.
[background]
The setting access policy in our tenant doesn`t apply to shared folders in external tenants.
We consider it is a risk to move folders or files incorrectly to shared folders in external tenants.2 votes -
As so many deep scan alerts, we can't find alerts detected only by reputation scans quickly.
Add the ability to search for alerts detected only by reputation scans.
3 votes -
Request: Rich Shield dashboard
Request for Shield Dash board
The information of the graphs is so simple.
Could you make the rich insight?
For example, whne the targeted user who caused anomalous download started downloading a lot f contents, how much increased #s of DL day by day, Week by week etc.Currently we need to export user activity report if we want to know more. so rich insight will be helpful for Box admin.
3 votesThe Box Shield Product team is researching the ask.
-
Box Classification Settings: provide ability to restrict modifications to Admins and Co-Admins
Currently, Box Classification configuration allows you to restrict classification modifications to Owner, Co-Owner, Editor, and Viewer Uploader. We would like to add Admin and Co-Admin to this list. Thank you!
1 vote -
Allows the report to see the classification labels that have been applied in the past
In the User Activity Report, when a classification label is changed, it is logged. However, it does not record from which label was changed to which label..
One user currently sets the privilege to edit classification labels to editors (general employees). However, the more users with editing privileges, the greater the security risk. The only way to avoid this risk is to limit the scope of editing privileges to the owner or co-owner (superior). In that case, it would be too inconvenient, since it would be necessary to apply to the superior for a change in the classification label.
By…5 votes -
Filter Marked as safe
Shield needs a filter and a display setting for the dashboard for an alert that have been checked and marked as safe, currently it is hard to identify alerts that have been checked by other admins and marked as safe causing duplicate effort.
5 votes -
Ability to provide feedback on anomalous download alerts
I would like the ability to provide user-level feedback on anomalous download alerts. Today, you can only provide feedback via the folder and suggest whether or not it contains sensitive information. It would be better if you could provide this feedback at the user level - if someone is on a specific team, they may be expected to download a lot of files from a specific folder. However, that behavior might be anomalous for another user on a different team. I also find that these alerts are often triggered for new users who are not actually downloading an unusual amount…
3 votes -
Shield Classification UI option should gray out when user does not have permissions to update classification
If the user does not have access to classify content, they should not get this option to change the classification in shield.
1 vote -
Information Barriers Segment Report
Add an Admin Console report that can easily show which users are within Information Barrier segments. or add information barriers to the current User Details report. The current User Details report does not pull any values from the Information Barriers segments.
1 vote -
The "Application Restriction" should be configurable with the same granularity as the "Download and Print Restriction".
(Japanese follows English)
In the "Download and Print Restriction" section of Box Shield's Access Policy, it is possible to apply download, print, move and copy restrictions to Browser/Mobile/BoxDrive by specifying Managed/Outside Users and Owner/Co-Owner/Editor.
On the other hand, third-party applications are not included in this restriction, and only downloads can be restricted under "Application Restrictions".
We would like to be able to set "Application Restriction" to the same granularity as "Download and Print Restriction, as it provides a more consistent user experience if the same controls are applied regardless of which device or application is accessing the site.
Box Shieldのアクセスポリシーの「ダウンロードと印刷の制限」でブラウザ/モバイル/BoxDriveに対してダウンロードや印刷、移動、コピーの制限を管理対象/外部ユーザや所有者/共同所有者/編集者を指定して制限を適用することが出来ます。…
11 votes -
Download and Print restriction policy and Office co-authoring
I have Office co-editing enabled on my device.
An error appears when I try to edit an Office file from a web browser that has the file labeled with "Download and Print Restrictions Access Policy for Box Desktop" enabled.
It's meant to be a label to disable BoxDrive, but I'm having trouble if I can't edit it from a web browser.
Please enable Office co-authoring from a web browser, even if the file is labeled with these restriction.
2 votes -
Give download rights for analysis without flagging safe
Hi, we have a process of validating in a secured sandbox environment documents that are flag as malicious to be analyse to put back into circulation if it's a false positive. Right now, Box Shield co-admin cannot retrieve those documents. Support suggest to flag them as false positive, download them and revert them back. It is a horrible practice to have to do that. It gives false information to the AI and it prevents automation via webhooks.
I have a multiple async jobs I want to run when a file becomes a false positive. This way of downloading is dangerous…
3 votes -
Box Shield Alert for Anomalous Deletion of Folders or Data
We would like an alert to be created if a user deletes an anomalous amount of data. We recently had an employee leave the company under bad terms and found that before we could let her go, she had deleted a bunch of folders from Box. We were able to recover them, but this would be an indicator (much like anomalous download alerts) that something is up with this employee and we should be digging in deeper.
2 votes -
Make MPIP and Shield Classification Labels Bidirectional
This make require partnership with Microsoft, but it would be ideal if the MPIP integration was bidirectional. For example, if a file in Box doesn't have an MPIP label, but a Shield classification label is applied, the document would have an MPIP label applied based on the mapping table
4 votes -
Shield admin notifications to other admins when files are marked safe, etc
Interest in letting all Shield admins know when a file has been marked safe, useable, etc by another Shield admin
2 votes -
Allow admins to be able to exclude specific folders from scanning policies
Be able to safelist individual folders and their content, in case the latter are part of normal operational activities of specific teams, and to reduce false positives/noise to SecOps teams.
2 votes -
Request to improve the behavior of files with "Download and Print Restrictions" set on Box Drive
In Shield > Access Policy, we are creating a classification label for the policy that has "Restrict downloading and printing" set as the security control.
Depending on when you set this label classification, Box Drive may not have the limitations you expect.
I would like to see an improvement so that files with "Download and Print Restrictions" set cannot be opened or copied in Box Drive from the moment the settings are set.The specific steps and events are as follows.
1. Open the file before setting the classification label in Box Drive.
2. Edit, save and close the file.…4 votes -
Shield Requests
Currently Box sheild has the capability to Scan only newly updated/created files or only if the existing file is modified. In simple terms the scan happens only for the newly created version of the files and not any existing files before Box shield is being implemented.
Feature request:
We need to have the option of Scanning all the files at rest & transit in Box irrespective of when it was created/ modified, etc so that it can detect any malware on already available files as well.
Currently Box only encrypts the file with a red banner on top if malware…
2 votes -
Be able to Block specific filetypes from being uploaded to Box
Allow for an organization-wide policy to block specific filetypes from being uploaded to Box, or at least prevent them from being uploaded/moved to specific folders with specific classifications.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?