AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box)
My feedback
309 results found
-
17 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
2 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
73 votes
This is not on the short term roadmap (6 month) due to other higher priorities.
AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
1 voteAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
40 votes
Due to other higher priority initiatives, this is not prioritized at this time.
AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
18 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
5 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
64 votes
Thank you for your input. This idea is considered for future roadmap. Please reach out to me if you like to share your use case.
AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
1 voteAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
2 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
2 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
1 voteAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
2 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
2 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
1 voteAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
4 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
Thank you for your suggestion.
We explored this during our initial investigations, and our customers told us they did not want record of prior holds in this view, thus potentially implicating them in still being responsible for the litigation.
This is not planned work but may be reconsidered if there is a ton of customer feedback to the contrary.
An error occurred while saving the comment AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
5 votesAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
1 voteAdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·
-
42 votes
Thank you for the feedback! At this time, we cannot prioritize this request, but will keep this under consideration for future feature prioritization.
AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
Ideally this would be built into the UI by now...
If the concern for adding a 'Released Holds' section is that this might implicate that a legal team and/or company is still responsible for the litigation, then this can easily be solved by flagging in the UI that this is for audit purposes only and/or the company is no longer responsible for the litigation.
At the very least there should be a report that we can pull to audit and/or see previous legal holds.