Skip to content

John Nickell

My feedback

46 results found

  1. 487 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Nickell commented  · 

    Another use case for Hiding folders specifically from Box Drive, though it might be useful to hide them in the web interface as well is "Administratively Shared directories".
    For example we have a folder of Support Ticket information, you don't want to confuse employees with having that show up in Box drive, but you do want to be able to access it for a script. You are having an employee run a logging script that captures information to the local drive. To ease data collection you could have the script capture it's logs to Box Drive.

    As a side effect this could in some way be used to mirror favorites into Box Drive?

    John Nickell supported this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    John Nickell shared this idea  · 
  3. 68 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    not planned  ·  katiele responded

    This suggestion is not under consideration for our roadmap. We are currently focusing on improving the performance and UI to manage users in the Users & Groups tab. We will revisit this request to make removal of users from the suppression list self-service in the next 6 months. In the meantime, we will explore short-term options to notify the admin if a user is added to the suppression list.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Nickell commented  · 

    Further if the admin were able to remove a user from blacklist, it'd be another step in reducing service tickets. I've run into this issue numerous times until we modified our new user setup to ensure that their mailbox was setup the day before their Box access was added.

    John Nickell supported this idea  · 
  4. 40 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thank you for the suggestion. We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap.

    Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    John Nickell commented  · 

    The search baked into Box drive does have some value, but it can be such a **** shoot about what results will be returned for you. Especially since the returned results are limited to ?25? (saw that in a post somewhere)

    This is a little more than frustrating because if we compare to a "similar" product OneDrive for Business, it DOES support searching of subdirectories and files like you would expect to see in Windows explorer, which at a minimum would allow you to constrain your search to a folder.

    From what I can see OneDrive is implemented in a way that does allow the local computer's indexing engine to catalog the information stored on it. I recognize that for a company's larger amount of data this might not be entirely desirable. (i.e. we have 5 TB+ on Box, and wouldn't want everyone's local computer attempting to index all 5TB.

    John Nickell supported this idea  · 
  5. 32 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    not planned  ·  2 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Web App  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    not planned  ·  Brad Monroe responded

    Thanks for the suggestion! We don’t currently plan to increase this limit given the potential performance impact this would have on page load times. We are, however, looking into alternate solutions for pagination.

1 3 Next →

Feedback and Knowledge Base