Anonymous
My feedback
81 results found
-
9 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
Thank you for your submission. However, this does not have enough demand in order to be prioritized.
We will reconsider with additional use cases.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
19 votes
No plans at this time to make this more granular – while we’re interested in this one, to make this feature work well there is a decent amount of UI complexity to sort through on both the admin and end-user side.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Anonymous shared this idea ·
-
2 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
37 votes
We are going to prioritize making the login page more intuitive rather than providing customization capability.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
Thank you for this suggestion. I understand the use case. However, we do not plan to accommodate that level of customization at this time.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
SCIM-based user provisioning from Okta to Box would be a great add-on to Box.