Keith Schrecke
My feedback
84 results found
-
11 votes
We are re-designing the managed users page and will focus on adding advanced filtering of managed users by status as a follow up. Right now, releasing the re-design will be our first priority, so filtering by status is not on the near-term
(6 month) roadmap. We will revisit this after we release the new page.Keith Schrecke supported this idea · -
54 votes
This is the natural behavior for lexicographic sorting which treats everything as a string. We are unlikely to change this behavior in the near- or mid-term.
Keith Schrecke supported this idea · -
33 votes
As we work to build out a more robust compliance framework, this is absolutely something we’ll be considering. However, it is not on the near-term roadmap.
Keith Schrecke supported this idea · -
Add additional collaborator role between "Editor" and "Viewer Uploader" that allows a user to delete
5 votesThanks for the suggestion! Based on the current information provided, we don’t currently have a feature like this planned.
We’d love to hear additional use case context from interested users, however, in why the need exists to have Viewer Uploaders be able to ‘delete’ without simply raising them to ‘Editor’ level. Any additional information would be very helpful.
An error occurred while saving the comment Keith Schrecke supported this idea · -
24 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
-
9 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
-
57 votes
Due to other higher priorities, we are not considering this item at this time.
Keith Schrecke supported this idea · -
23 votes
Due to other higher priority items, this will not be planned at this time.
Keith Schrecke supported this idea · -
9 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
This is currently not planned. We are looking into restrictions that admins could set at this level, but there is nothing planned on the roadmap for this as of now.
Keith Schrecke supported this idea · -
4 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
-
20 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
-
37 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
-
26 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
-
6 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Users should be able to leverage the ‘Groups’ feature for the use case of re-inviting the same group of collaborators multiple times.
-
12 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
Thanks for the feedback! However, this is an edge use case which would add complexity to the product. We will review this with additional demand.
Keith Schrecke supported this idea · -
16 votes
Unfortunately this is not planned in the near-term, but please do keep adding use cases so we can consider this request for the future.
Keith Schrecke supported this idea · -
49 votesKeith Schrecke supported this idea ·
In our implementation we have reserved Owners/ Co-owners for Service Accounts.
One of the main reasons is for security. We do not want our users to be able to change the sharing settings on folders and we want to be able to limit the use of anonymous links.
Also, we want to limit the users' who can permission other users.
Therefore we are stuck with Editors who can add users which we consider to be a distinct "Administrative" role. But they are the only ones who can delete a file
And Viewer Uploaders are hobbled by the inability to delete or rename a file.
We require a role who can perform all the Editor functions, without the ability to add users to a folder.