Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

3 results found

  1. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree with this feedback. My team also relies heavily on Box tasks, and we’ve found that aside from the basic statuses—In Progress, Completed, Approved, or Rejected—there isn’t a meaningful way to sort or filter tasks. My team reports that it can be clunky and cumbersome to navigate tasks, especially when dealing with a high volume. For example, our HR teammate often has between 50 to 100 active tasks at a time. It seems the current task functionality was not designed for managing that level of volume. However, when processing large quantities of paperwork across various workflows, it's quite common to exceed what the current filters and sorting tools in Box can handle efficiently.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base