Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 329 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    As of June 24th your response is "NOT PLANNED"????

    This is an outrage!!! As you're sun setting BoxSync (which allowed data to be stored to a different drive) and forcing users to use BoxDrive you have no desire or plans to implement this vital feature??? It seems that all those working in IT Support or users working large data, all agree that this should be a no brainer? Any environment dealing with large files (i.e. media, CAD, etc...) are essentially being handicapped by not implementing this. Opening files on the go takes time to download and makes editing and saving cumbersome as opposed to having them cached locally. But if you cache locally you're now limited to only the size of your system (OS) drive, instead of a separate storage drive. again, what are you guys thinking???

    If you fail to address this, users will eventually migrate to a product that provides this feature. It's rather unfortunate since we moved to box because it headlined enterprise level cloud sharing solution, and now you're just driving the same clientele away.

Feedback and Knowledge Base