Anonymous

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 529 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Option 2 is needed to be competitive with Dropbox. It's the only reason that I am still using Dropbox and hardly use Box at all, even though the latter is free through my institution. I would gladly pay a premium for this feature.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Currently, my Box folder contains more than 50 shared folders that have no organizational scheme to them. It is extremely difficult to find materials because I cannot organize these folders into larger categories. For example, I have many folders shared to me for purposes of department business (at a university), but they are scattered here and there in my box folder. If I could organize them all under one folder (such as "Dept_Admin"), then it would be much easier to find them. Box's main competitor (no need to name them) easily allows one to organize shared folders this way, and that is why I generally use their shared folder system whenever possible. My university has chosen to contract with Box, and in this regard, that was a terrible choice.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base