Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 487 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Option 2 is needed to be competitive with Dropbox. It's the only reason that I am still using Dropbox and hardly use Box at all, even though the latter is free through my institution. I would gladly pay a premium for this feature.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Currently, my Box folder contains more than 50 shared folders that have no organizational scheme to them. It is extremely difficult to find materials because I cannot organize these folders into larger categories. For example, I have many folders shared to me for purposes of department business (at a university), but they are scattered here and there in my box folder. If I could organize them all under one folder (such as "Dept_Admin"), then it would be much easier to find them. Box's main competitor (no need to name them) easily allows one to organize shared folders this way, and that is why I generally use their shared folder system whenever possible. My university has chosen to contract with Box, and in this regard, that was a terrible choice.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base