Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This would be a huge improvement for my project.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 869 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This would be very useful for our use case (browsing a large collection of photos/videos) as well - just a plain grid of thumbnails would be a great way to visualize it - assuming the thumbnail enhancement can be added:

    https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778-help-shape-the-future-of-box/suggestions/39036652-box-ui-elements-content-explorer-needs-real-thumbn

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We have a very similar use case. Separating the picking from the exploring is problematic since they kind of go hand-in-hand.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    These fields are not generally useful for archival read-only repo purposes since it's the date of upload and the archive owner (rather than the original content date and owner) shown. It's meaningless and confusing data taking up screen real estate in this case. Ability to hide it would be a huge win for us as well.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base