Skip to content

Help shape the future of Box

Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!

See user guide here.

What problem could Box solve for you?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

31 results found

  1. Tale over the settings in shield trial mode

    Currently, the trial mode classification and settings will disappear at the end of the trial period.
    If we have a Shield contract, we would like to take over its classification and settings.

    By eliminating the need to set them up again in the production environment, we can make a smooth transition.

    4 votes
    1 comment  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  2. Box Shield inherit classification on move/copy, not only on upload

    Box Shield needs to have the ability for files to inherit the classification of the containing folder during a move or copy. Currently, a file will only inherit the classification if it is uploaded to the folder with a certain classification. Example:

    File A has a classification of "Confidential" and is moved/copied to a folder that has an "Internal" classification. File A will not automatically inherit the "Internal" permission, and it either needs to be manually changed to "Internal", or have the entire containing folder re-classified as "Internal" so that all containing files then inherit the "Internal" classification.

    However, if…

    3 votes
    not planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  3. Device Pinning as a condition for "Download Restriction"

    Wondering if "device pinning" can register details of devices utilized by the user and allows/disallow the login from it. Why cant it be used as a condition under "Download Restriction". MDM solutions are not yet fully matured to cover all & frequently changing devices types .

    1 vote
    2 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  4. Return character in Classification Definition

    Currently "Classification Definition" can be written with 'return character' in its input form. But when this "Classification Definition" is shown to the user, 'return character' is being ignored and is shown in one line.

    Definition needs to be shown in the same way it was written / configured, and also needs to be shown in several lines when required (e.g. written in multiple languages where each language's definition needs to be shown in each line, instead of all in single line).

    1 vote
    not planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  5. Using Smart Access

    When entering a List when creating a Shield Smart Access Policy, have drop down appear that shows all available lists with short descriptions so the user doesn't have to try to remember the names of the lists they created or what they generally contain.

    1 vote
    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  6. Provide reports around external users' sharing activity and track via Box Shield and display in the new Activity Stream.

    4 votes
    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  7. We want the ability for Download policies to also trigger on unusual download activity by external collaborators

    We see external collaborators with high download activity using accounts outside of our enterprise (ie: gmail, yahoo?). The business is getting quite frustrated that they cannot report on these email addresses.

    3 votes
    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  Anonymous responded

    This is quite complex to implement, we are researching to figure out how best to fix this.

  8. Set default classification for all uploads with Box Classification

    When every file is uploaded, set a default Classification value that can be updated manually or via a partner (Netskope, SkyHigh, Titus, etc.).

    13 votes
    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) responded

    Default classification label is not planned because it could be misleading to end users. However, to address the concern of content being leaked before it is classified, you can create an access policy applying to “All content without a classification label” in Box Shield.

  9. Granular permissions per user for sharing public links/classified documents

    The administrator should be able to set the default classification for all new documents (e.g. For Official Use).

    Each user should be able to set their own default classification (which will override the system setting (e.g. Classified).

    Each user should be able to change the classification for any new or existing document where she has sufficient rights. For existing documents, she should also be able to select multiple documents, and then change the classification for all those documents in one go.

    1 vote
    0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) responded

    Default classification label is not planned because it could be misleading to end users. However, to address the concern of content being leaked before it is classified, you can create an access policy applying to “All content without a classification label” in Box Shield.

  10. Events API - Add Policy Name to CONTENT_WORKFLOW_UPLOAD_POLICY_VIOLATION

    Currently, when an Upload Policy violation occurs, Box reports on that violation in 3 ways:
    1. Email notification
    2. Admin Console -> Reports tab
    3. Events API

    In the email notification and admin console->reports, Box provides the policy name for which the violation is occurring. However, Box does NOT include the policy name in the Events API entry, which causes a problem when we are pulling logs (via the Events API) into external reporting/SIEM tools like ArcSight/Splunk.

    Request: Add 'Policy Name' to the CONTENTWORKFLOWUPLOADPOLICYVIOLATION entry in the Events API (to reach parity with the native Admin…

    1 vote
    not planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  11. Selectively disable syncing to mobile and desktop based on content classification and/or user group.

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Shield  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
2 Next →
  • Don't see your idea?

Help shape the future of Box

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)

By entering and viewing this page, you agree to be bound by (1) UserVoice Terms of Service and the (2) Box Community Terms of Use. In the event of a direct conflict between the foregoing terms of service with respect to the Box Community Guidelines, Feedback and Suggestions, the Box Community Terms of Use shall take precedence as between you and Box.