Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
267 results found
-
Shield - Malicious Content alerting should provide greater details
Malicious Content alerts within Shield should provide more information on why a file is considered "malicious", to aid the process of sandboxing and investigation (such as threat type, family etc).
16 votes -
Support mapping a single Microsoft Entra ID tenant to multiple Box enterprises (MPIP–Box Shield label integration)
Request: Allow a single Microsoft Entra ID tenant to be connected to multiple Box enterprises, so that MPIP sensitivity labels can be mapped to Box Shield classifications in each of them.
Background：Currently, the MPIP sensitivity label to Box Shield classification integration can only be established between one Microsoft Entra ID tenant and one Box enterprise (1:1).
However, many organizations operate a single Entra ID tenant while maintaining multiple separate Box enterprises — for example, group companies whose subsidiaries keep their content stores separated but share a single corporate identity provider and a single Purview governance policy.
Under the current 1:1…
4 votes -
I want to define multiple AI classification policies.
Only one AI classification policy can be defined in "Classification Policy". Since the policies that I want to apply to each folder are different, I want to be able to define multiple AI classification policies.
[In Japanese]
「分類ポリシー」に、AI分類ポリシーを一つしか定義できない。フォルダごとに適用したいポリシーが異なる為、複数のAI分類ポリシーを定義できるようにしたい。5 votes -
AI restriction in shield access policy
Shield Access Policy Settings to include the possibility to restrict the use of AI on content. That would prevent using AI on files containing PII, or other files including sensitive content in particular when using Box AI in Box Hubs.
19 votes -
Show the date the classification label was applied for items uploaded by external users.
件名：外部ユーザーがアップロードしたアイテムに対して、分類ラベルが適用された日付を表示する
Regardless of whether the user checking the date the classification label was applied has the appropriate permissions, if the user who uploaded the item is an external user, the date the classification label was applied is not displayed.
It is inconvenient that this cannot be confirmed from the Box UI.
While it is possible to check the classification label application date in the User Activity Report, doing so requires an administrator or co-admin and can take time.
Please make the date the classification label was applied visible on the item details page for the relevant item.訳：
分類ラベルが適用された日を確認するユーザが適切な権限を付与されているか否かにかかわらず、アイテムをアップロードしたユーザが外部ユーザの場合、分類ラベルが適用された日付が表示されません。
Boxの画面で確認することができないのは不便です。…4 votes -
Show Shield-flagged files in the folder list, and tell users when a folder download skips them
When Shield flags a file as malicious, there is no way to see that in All Files or the folder list. Users have to open each file to find the red banner. If someone downloads the whole folder, the flagged file is left out of the download and there is no notice of what was skipped.
Please add a clear indicator on flagged files in the folder view, and tell the user when a folder download omits a flagged file. End users should not have to click every item, and they should not lose content silently.
1 vote -
I would like to add a [Block all integrations] option to the content read restrictions for integrations.
Adding [Specify content read restrictions on integrations.] under [Integration Restriction] in Shield access policies is an excellent update from a data protection perspective.
However, under the current specifications, it is not possible to block all integrations. Since the remaining risk that data may be read by even some integrations is unacceptable from a security standpoint, this ultimately hinders the enablement and adoption of AI. The download restrictions under the same [Integration Restriction] include a [Block all integrations] option, so it is puzzling that the read restrictions do not.
I would like to request the addition of a [Block all integrations]…1 vote -
Locking Box files or folders with Box shield so they cannot be deleted
I would like to use Box Shield to have certain standard folders in our folder structure locked so that any files inside can not be deleted
1 vote -
Provide watch list for anomalous downloads
I would like shield to have a watch list of people they know are going to leave the company within the next 30 days. I want to be able to tell if someone on that list starts downloading a large number of files during that 30-day window so they can immediately cut off their access.
2 votes -
wildcard domain blocking
We would like to be able to use wildcards within our environment for blocking whole domains, in our case we plan to target unexpected countries via the domain block policy. By default we would like to prevent any box accounts from an unexpected source from being collaborated with. If we ever encounter an exception to this default we plan to use the ability within shield to create a whitelist to allow only those accounts which are expected to bypass the policy.
1 vote -
Malware Scan - Record Scan Status
Admins want the ability to check if a file has been scanned by Box Shield for malware
31 votesThis is on the proposed roadmap for this year.
-
I would need for compliance issues to restrict specific user download and print permission while letting them to edit the files within BOX
I would need for compliance issues to restrict specific user download and print permission while letting them to edit the files within BOX
1 vote -
Ethical Walls - enhancement to Information Barriers for neutral site scenarios
Make information barriers work in neutral site scenarios. Where Group A and Group B can't collaborate each other, But if Group C invites Group A and Group B into their folder, the two groups can collaborate in the same space.
1 vote -
Screen shot blocking
Have Box, through its security mechanism, prevent screenshots from occurring on content that is sensitive, in addition to watermarking that content.
1 vote -
Feature Request: Flexible External Sharing Controls with Combined Allow/Block Logic (Box Shield)
Current Situation (As-Is)
Box Shield does not support applying multiple external collaboration restrictions on the same content.
As a result:When a folder is classified with an allow-list policy, sharing externally is restricted only to explicitly approved email addresses managed in shield list.
This overrides the broader domain-based sharing rules, preventing sharing with otherwise permitted external domain.Example impact:
A folder with classification cannot be shared with regular external users from allowed domains, unless they are explicitly included in the allow list.
Current workaround:
Admins must manually maintain allow-lists (emails) for the classified folder.
Problem
Lack of flexibility in combining…
1 vote -
Setting to allow classification additions/increases but not deletions/decreases
Box Shields allows you to disable classification modifications for everyone except admins, but this is too restrictive. What we're looking for:
- Allow classification labels to be ranked by sensitivity
- Add configuration setting to allow Editors to add/increase sensitivity but not be able to delete/decrease sensitivity.
Without this, we're finding we have to choose between diffusing accountability of classification labels vs. administrative overhead of having an admin or owner manage all classification label additions.
1 vote -
Redundant Shield alerts
Box Shield should be able to recognize when the same file or file set appears in multiple locations and treat it as a single item, rather than generating duplicate alerts across each instance. This would allow users to acknowledge (or dismiss) an alert globally—once for all occurrences—rather than having to clear it separately for every flagged file.
8 votes -
Security Control - Download and Print Restriction, possibility for Owners/Co-owners and Editors exceptions
Security Control - Download and Print Restriction, possibility for Owners/Co-owners and Editors to be excluded from this restriction.
Currently, for managed users it's possible to restrict all users except Owners/Co-owners and Editors.
It would be beneficial to have a similar option for restricting external users1 vote -
Shield - Download and Navigate to a file directly from a Malicious Content Shield Alert
For the Malicious Content rule, it should be possible to download a malicious file directly from a Shield Alert for sandboxing without having to search for it.
Also, an admin who has Content Manager access should be able to click a button within the alert and navigate to the file in the Content Manager to manage it.
3 votes -
Access Policy to Restrict Access to Specified Groups
With Hubs, users' ability to add content to a Hub increases the chance of accidentally giving access to unintended internal users. For sensitive content, it would be nice to be able to have an access policy applied to specific classification that restricts document access to users in specific groups to prevent internal data leakage.
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?