Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

1 result found

  1. 31 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This issue is a huge miss from Box and has been brought up many many times as we move companies from file shares to Box. It's very confusing when you share subfolders with other collaborators and they only see the subfolder name instead of retaining the tree structure. For example, if I have a "Reports" top level folder with CompanyA, CompanyB and CompanyC as subfolders but I give someone access to only CompanyA and CompanyB then it doesn't keep the two subfolders under Reports for their view. Those two subfolders now look like top level folders. This is a terrible design as is the lack of breaking waterfall permissions. Both of these are standards in the file share systems that have been around for decades.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base