Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

5 results found

  1. 531 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    What is an update on this?

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 209 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    not planned  ·  Anonymous responded

    We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We are working on a new way to deploy folder structure company wide that heavily depends on bookmarks. This will allow more than 3000 people to effectively navigate content find this quicker.
    would appreciate it if you guys could consider this for development soon.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    We are launching a corporate wide folder structure with a huge dependence on bookmarks that will allow more 3000 people to navigate and find file better. As an industry we rely heavily on desktop workflows. This functionality is much needed for us. Would be very grateful if this can be worked on soon!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Hello given our approach to using box for content management in construction we absolutely need this functionality to limit the creation of rogue folders in the cloud. Please let us know if you can prioritize this development.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 46 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 286 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 332 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    not planned  ·  Anonymous responded

    We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.

    Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.

    We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base