Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

6 results found

  1. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    not planned  ·  jfan responded

    We are not likely to implement this. From a customer experience perspective, it would be difficult to explain to companies not in this situation why another enterprise can enforce different collaboration settings on their users.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    not planned  ·  rbalakrishnan responded

    Thank you for your feedback. This is not planned for now due to other priorities.

    We will evaluate this again with renewed customer demand.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Thanks, this is a great suggestion but not one that is currently on our roadmap. In the mean time, you can consider using Webhooks to get relevant events and make use of a simple transactional email/sms API such as those provided by Twilio/Sendgrid or Amazon SES to send notifications based on those events.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I think this is a great idea. Every organization's workflow (and utilization of Box) is different. And with other (CMS) systems, it is usually possible to create workflows & notifications on almost any actions.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Agree. We have API integration and also use Box for Salesforce (an official product from Box). In the latter, the service account associated to the integration receives countless email notifications for each time an end user accesses a record within Salesforce.

    I've seen some ideas posted here relating to the ability to customize/brand the email notifications (via API). The ideal solution here would be a combination of both (ability to suppress collaboration -- and other -- email notifications, and the ability to customize these system-driven emails).

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base