mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
My feedback
46 results found
-
203 votes
We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!
mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesmike.westley@avisonyoung.com
shared this idea
·
-
28 votes
Our team is gathering feedback and additional use cases regarding this suggestion.
Please add your comments about your specific needs and use cases:
- Would you prefer to configure the date format on the request level or organization level? Why?
- Will you constantly adjust the date format depending on recipients or it's a one time setting?
- What date format is ideal for you?
- Anything else that would help us to design and build a great solution to improve your experience.
_____
Support this suggestion so we can prioritize it accordingly.
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
Why would you want the language/format of the date to be the same when there is multiple signers with different language setting? surely, you need the date format to be appropriate to the person reading/signing - ie appears differently, depending on language setting??
mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesmike.westley@avisonyoung.com
shared this idea
·
-
1 votemike.westley@avisonyoung.com
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesmike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
1 votemike.westley@avisonyoung.com
shared this idea
·
-
1 votemike.westley@avisonyoung.com
shared this idea
·
-
18 votes
We'll be evaluating improvements to Shared Links later this year and will provide an update at that time.
mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
The Content Search results also need to be able to select/goto a specific page from the pages generated (as is available in other locations in listed items with multiple pages)
Ie user should be able to click on 'Page 1 of 259' and see a dropdown of numbers 1 to 259, and select any, or type the page number.
Currently it's impossible to display the most recent content results, without scrolling through all the pages!!
Once the sort by columns options is added, the equivalent of page sorting will be available by sorting on date order (descending)
mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
shared this idea
·
-
67 votesmike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesmike.westley@avisonyoung.com
shared this idea
·
-
11 votesmike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
63 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
I'd like to suggest that there be an option in Box Admin, for each Co-admin to store a 'default' user admin report date range. eg from 01/01/2023 to date, or 'last 3 months' etc
As a Co-admin deletes a user's Box account, it should trigger a scheduled/overnight report to run for that period for the user's account that is being deleted.
That report, on completion, would be available in the co-admin's Box reports folder, in same way as other reports that are run.
This avoids a) co-admins having to request Box Support to restore deleted Box accounts, and b) provides an audit report for leavers, in case needed in subsequent investigations/searches
mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
Two weeks to go to the 3rd anniversary of this pulse idea's share by moderator. Rather, this is a major bug - an identification of security flaw which prevents the collaboration of folder content to more than one 3rd party/client at a time. This loophole should have been resolved before spending time on some new features.
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
Please can you update us all on the status of this request for change - particularly as it relates to security and makes the current feature of sharing with 3rd parties incomplete (allows them to see other users names in Version History etc).
We were advised that it was being considered - yet the last note here from Box/Moderator is April 2020!!
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
SECURITY ALERT!! The purpose of a folder's Privacy settings (Collaborators) "Hide collaborators and their activity from non-owners" is for (and I quote) "only the folder owner and co-owners will be able to view collaborators and their activity in the folder".
This is not the case - because, unlike in other areas where a name or email address is replaced by "Someone", when a collaborator views the File Version History, for a file uploaded or edited by someone else, it STILL shows the other collaborator's name - contrary to the Privacy Setting.
In other words, this feature currently does not anonymize any names shown in the Version History. The names of any non-owner collaborators who upload a new version will be visible to other collaborators in the file's Version history.
Box should urgently rectify this, replacing the collaborator's name with "Someone"
Box should also move the 'Commenting' section of folder settings to BELOW Privacy, and highlight the possible need to disable Commenting also when collaborating with 3rd parties/clients
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
Whilst I would not necessarily wish to hide comments, tasks and version history in these circumstances, Box SHOULD hide ALL the names and email addresses associated with collaborators when the Privacy settings are ticked to 'Hide collaborators and their activity from non-owners'. In this regard, the Privacy settings are NOT doing this - with regard to a) being able to see collaborators details in File Version History, and b) being able to add a comment, and type @A ... or @B.... through to @Z.... and being able to identify other collaborators (because Box offers the name(s) when typing @.. in comments
I am creating a SPECIFIC suggestion/bug that failing to hide collaborator details in File Version History (by replacing name with "Someone") defeats the object of the Privacy feature
mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
I've also voted for this, however, please note that the Windows Ctrl Z (undo) and Ctrl Y (redo), do actually work whilst in a Box Note..... would still prefer button(s) to remind me though :)
mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
133 votesmike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
The alternative to this, is that EVERY Report run is SAVED to give it a name :( and change the parameters when a new report of the same type is required
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
I totally agree - to assist with resolving our own customers queries, it is sometimes necessary to run several User Activity or Collaborations reports in the same day.
The folder is created prior to report being completed, but if we amend the folder name to include, say, our customer's name and, say, an IT Support reference, Box does NOT use the folder, and creates a new one.
Having to open similarly named folders and the csv file to remember why the report was run/requested ... is annoying....
Why can't the option to give SAVED reports a name not be extended to, say, add 20 characters free text to both the report folder name and the csv filename ???
mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
commented
Depending on the location in Box (Web), and the screen size used to display the Box (Web), content displayed in columns does not display the full content - it truncates instead.
For example, in Box Admin\Reports\ Report status screen, there are 4 columns - Report type, Generated by, Updated, Status, Notes
When displayed on a 25" monitor, the Updated column displays the full Date, Time correctly in Google Chrome with display at 75% - ie Jan 19, 2023, 1:17PM GMT
Still at 75% on a 24" monitor, the last part of date is truncated
On a laptop 14" monitor, it is necessary to reduce the Zoom to 33%!! to display the full date
In ALL LOCATIONS of Box Web. where data/content is listed in table format, either a) Column Widths should be adjustable, or b) content is WRAPPED, or c) hovering over the content displays the whole content (as does on some report outputs)
mike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesmike.westley@avisonyoung.com
supported this idea
·
Would you prefer to configure the date format on the request level or organization level? Why?
AT ORGINAZATION LEVEL, BUT ALSO THEN CONFIGURABLE BASED UPON THE DEVICE'S REGION SETTINGS - OFFER LONG DATE OR SHORT DATE, OR SHORT DATE AND SHORT TIME - REGION SETTINGS SHOULD HAVE PRIORITY OVER ORGANIZATION LEVEL SETTING
Will you constantly adjust the date format depending on recipients or it's a one time setting?
DATE FORMAT WILL CHANGE WHEN THE REGION A DEVICE IS USED IN CHANGES. USERS MAY WISH TO CHANGE DATE FORMAT (BETWEEN LONG AND SHORT DATE/TIME WHEN THEY WISH TO (DEPENDS ON WHETHER A SCREEN ALLOWS COLUMN WIDTH CHANGES)
What date format is ideal for you?
I WORK IN UK, THE DATE FORMAT I WISH TO USE MAY CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE FUNCTIONALITY AVAILABLE IN A SCREEN/REPORT I AM LOOKING AT - IF COLUMN WIDTHS CANNOT BE CHANGED, AND A LONG DATE IS TRUNCATED ON SCREEN, I MAY WISH TO CHANGE TO SHORT DATE/SHORT DATE/TIME (ONE EXAMPLE)
Anything else that would help us to design and build a great solution to improve your experience.
RELYING ON REGION SETTINGS, MEANS USERS MAY CHANGE BETWEEN REGIONAL FORMATS WHEN THEY WISH. BUT BOX SHOULD OFFER USERS TO PICK BETWEEN SHORT DATE, SHORT DATE+TIME, AND LONG DATE, FOR ANY COLUMN, SCREEN, REPORT, IF BOX HAS NOT ENABLED COLUMN WIDTHS AND FONTS TO BE CHANGED