Anonymous
My feedback
14 results found
-
89 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous supported this idea ·An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedUp till now I was able to use Box in a way that I could use MacOS Finder tags with colours to make a personal planning for my work.
Apparently that is no longer possible with Box Drive (2.23 and 2.24).
This is a major set back for my use of Box.
Why is this no longer possible?Response from Box:
Thank you for reaching Box Product Support. Allow me to assist you from here.
As per the Finder Tags, Box doesn't have the control over this feature. Please reach out to Apple for further assistance,
MarkWent trough a lot of discussions with Apple support, and their response was that the issue lies with Box drive...
What is really happening here ?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedI used to have this feature in Mac Finder and Box Drive for years without a problem. Why is this taking so long to fix this ?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedAdded a comment to support this request, but it disappeared...
-
166 votes
This is a great suggestion and one we’re considering for the future!
Anonymous supported this idea · -
364 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
336 votes
We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.
Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.
We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.
…
Anonymous supported this idea · -
8 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
17 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
14 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
2 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
We will consider supporting Box annotations as those will remain with the document across all Box services.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
3 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
3 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
5 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Thank you for your suggestion! This is not currently planned. We will review this given additional customer demand and use cases.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
9 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
I think at Box they have no clue at all about how frustrating it is to lose functionality in an app.
Starting to look for alternatives. But at Box they know very well that it is not easy to change an app used by 20+ people. That is what they are counting on ...
So sad to see this happen in a company I really believed in for years.
Hendrik Roos