Anonymous
My feedback
11 results found
-
1 voteAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
110 votes
This is not technically possible with the current non-persistent architecture of Box Drive.
When the ‘Box’ folder disappears (whens users quit, update, log out) Windows folder redirection creates a new ‘Box’ folder to continue to redirect content. This forks the redirection out of Box Drive.
Workarounds have been investigated heavily, but the cost to implement is too large to commit to the roadmap now.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
32 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
19 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
29 votes
Thanks for the suggestion of this addition. We are not currently planning to add this functionality, but will keep the post updated for future.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
98 votes
Due to other higher priority items, this has been deprioritized.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
33 votes
This is not something that we have on the roadmap for the foreseeable future. Notifications were suppressed for these items and we will be investigating different ways to make problem items in general more discoverable.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
336 votes
We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.
Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.
We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.
…
Anonymous supported this idea · -
18 votes
We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!
Anonymous supported this idea · -
160 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
547 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·