Anonymous
My feedback
32 results found
-
1 voteAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
1 voteAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
30 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
4 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
70 votes
The Product Team is considering this request for development the next year. Please share additional feedback and use cases to help us understand what functionality is the most needed and how it's going to be used.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
6 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
9 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
22 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
41 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Currently the provided signature will never exceed the maximum size allowed by the sender.
So signature size is fixed and configured by the sender.
Could you please provide more context on what type of auto-sizing is needed?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous shared this idea · -
49 votes
Thank you for the suggestion. We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!
Anonymous supported this idea · -
2 votesAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
1 voteAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
7 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedYes its good idea, with this also we can limit number of Workflow Creator, and common user can start the workflow manually with their name.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
5 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1 voteAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
32 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
39 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
6 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
Now its already OK for signature, but for date stamp, the printed date still exceeded the box if the font is not set to smaller size. Could you improved for date stamp too?