Anonymous

My feedback

194 results found

  1. 3 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 10 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 11 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 4 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  6. 61 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 13 votes
    How important is this to you?

    On account of our security stance we don’t want to expose the text layer unless a user has permission to download a file. As the text layer is required to initiate search we can not activate the feature for users who don’t have download permissions

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 6 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 7 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 8 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 8 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 11 votes
    How important is this to you?

    We are not planning to implement controls around this in Box Sync. You may consider trying Box Drive to see if that improves the resource utilization issue. Since it only uses bandwidth for content users access, it may help to improve things here.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 4 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 2 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 9 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 5 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 3 votes
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  dfisher responded

    Thank you for this suggestion! This is a low priority because it’s a very narrow use case. Changing this functionality does not impact a large enough user base.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 5 votes
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  Aaron Verstraete responded

    This is not something we will build due to other roadmap commitments.

    Alternatively, you could always upload latest version to “backup folder,” delete file from “current version” folder, then copy “backup folder” version to “current version” folder.

    This will get you 100% version history in backup folder and avoid the need to download & upload the file a second time.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 228 votes
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  Anonymous responded

    We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 9 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base