Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions

My feedback

  1. 22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  2. 5 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    not planned  ·  jfan responded

    Thank you for your submission. However, this does not have enough demand in order to be prioritized.

    We will reconsider with additional use cases.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions commented  · 

    I also strongly do support this request.
    When a malicious user tries to steal confidential information without being noticed by SIEM, he/she searches for some specific keyword to reach to the target document.
    We need to detect those suspecious user who searches for those word.

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  3. 58 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under consideration  ·  0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Web App  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  4. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Security  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  5. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    We don’t currently plan to provide such an API, however please leave a comment if you have more information about how this would be used. In the interim, you can identify all of a user’s collaborations by requesting items in the user’s root folder (id = 0) and filtering out those where the owned_by user is the current user. This would require an additional API call for each item to get the collaboration id, but if you are only interested in knowing which items re collaborated versus owned by the user, it may be sufficient for your purposes.

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions commented  · 

    In current specification, the numbers of collaborated users are configured as CAN_VIEW_PATH = True via API and it is causing us big issue that we get the parents folders of actual invited folders included to the folder list of FolderID = 0.

  6. 170 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    under consideration  ·  katiele responded

    We are beginning to develop solutions that will allow external users to be placed in groups. We’ll post an update when this feature officially makes it onto our roadmap.

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  7. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thank you for the suggestion. This is an interesting idea but not one we currently have on the roadmap. In the mean time, you can apply techniques such as caching (i.e. fetch what you need once for a session and keep it in local storage) to reduce round-trips, and the use the ?fields query string parameter to request only the minimal set of fields you need, which can reduce API response times.

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  8. 27 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Thanks for your patience and feedback, Ian.

    I am curious to hear if we were to implement something like what Google has, which endpoints would you expect to see higher rate limits around?

    Also, would you mind sharing some more details around the frequency of the API calls your processes are making right now, and any approximations around what rate limits would suffice for you?

    Thank you!

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  9. 17 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  10. 287 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  11. 335 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  13. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions shared this idea  · 
  14. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  15. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Governance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  16. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions shared this idea  · 
  17. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Web App  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  18. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  19. 360 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    on roadmap  ·  14 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Admin Console  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
  20. 424 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    under consideration  ·  63 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Desktop  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Murakami Akihiko @ Marubeni IT Solutions supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base