Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
184 results found
-
Records management certificate of destruction
In order to support a variety of compliant content management use cases, GxP validation, and fulfill various audit requirements, Box should provide business-centric proof that a record (one to many files with versioned metadata) has been properly disposed according to a retention schedule. Business leaders engaged in a GxP audit need more visibility into records beyond what is available in technical solutions like the Event Stream API and / or Box admin-level reporting.
14 votes -
Archives for perfomance
Hello, I have more and more people that come back to me because Box takes more and more time to load and by the way give the feeling of beeing slower.
The root cause is the huge amount of files, folders ...
So what is needed urgently is to get the possibility to archive what is not yet useful.When I check all the pulse request about archives, they all be tagged at not planned but this feature must exist and this is a really big issue.
So please take time to consider this request because it has to exist…
1 vote -
2 votes
-
Separate Disposition Policy Management
Customers would like the ability to manage automated content deletion separate from retention policies. This would allow content to be deleted sooner than the policy designates. Ability to extend the disposition date would be important (including through relay workflows where approvals could be gathered). Ability to designate the disposition timing from upload date (and not edit date for new versions of a file) is also desired.
1 vote -
translation of classifications
I have a lot of managed languages in Box but classifications are not translated. It would be great if we could have only one classification (with its description) while today I have to create multiple ones (in English, French, Japanese, etc.)..
1 vote -
Expansion of File Version Limit settings
For customers currently using Governance, the "File Version Limit" setting can be set to 1-100 or unlimited.
We would like this setting to be improved so that it can be specified as 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, etc. The reason is that problems may occur when there are multiple file versions when migrating between tenants or within a tenant, so I would like to limit this in the settings.2 votes -
Box Governance should be enabled for managed users
We have observed that for Relay, there is an option titled "Relay enabled for all managed users." However, we couldn't find a similar option for Box Governance [tried with a co-admin privileged account].
Moreover, we found that only for the co-admins, policies of using Box governance can be enabled.Our specific request is to have the functionality to enable Box Governance for all managed users (not only the admin/co-admins), allowing each user to utilize these features individually.
1 vote -
Revert a folder to a previous state in time, including its contents
Revert a folder to a previous state in time, including its contents. Sorely missing feature, which has been need numerous times by my organization. Please add or risk defections...
1 vote -
Retention policy details in the Trash UI
The Bin/Trash UI displays Retention policy details the first time you trash an item until you navigate away.
Ability to have this info visible at all times in Trash UI would be helpful to end users and admin rather than running reports to check status of a single file.13 votes -
Larger capacity and limit for exporting legal hold content
Larger capacity and limit for exporting legal hold content
Currently, only two legal hold contents can be exported at a time, and the maximum export size is 4TB.
When there are many legal hold targets, the export setting needs to be repeated many times to download them, which takes a large amount of time.
Therefore, we would like you to revise the maximum number of targets and capacity.現在、リーガルホールドコンテンツのエクスポートは1度に２つまでしか対象を指定出来ず、かつ容量が4TBまでとなっております。
リーガルホールド対象が多いとダウンロードするために何度もエクスポート設定を繰り返す必要があり、時間が大量にかかります。
そのため、対象と容量の上限を見直しして欲しい。2 votes -
Regardless of the recycle bin deadline, legal holds are a priority
Regardless of the recycle bin deadline, legal holds are a priority
Under the current legal hold specification, the following contents are deleted from the recycle bin and become invisible even if a legal hold is applied when a deadline is set in the recycle bin.
This is a very unfortunate specification, and we would like to see it improved so that legal holds are prioritized over recycle bin expiration dates and not deleted.■Patterns that become invisible from the Recycle Bin
Folders and files deleted before legal hold
Folders/files deleted after legal hold現状のリーガルホールド仕様ではごみ箱に期限を設定しているとリーガルホールドをかけても下記コンテンツはごみ箱から削除され見えなくなってしまいます。
これは非常に残念な仕様です、そのため、リーガルホールドが優先され削除されないように改善して欲しい。■ごみ箱から見えなくなるパターン
・リーガルホールド前に削除されたフォルダ・ファイル
・リーガルホールド後に削除されたフォルダ2 votes -
Don't move or delete content with legal holds to a different folder
Don't move or delete content with legal holds to a different folder
The current specification is that content with a legal hold can be moved or deleted.
However, this is undesirable in a situation where fraud has been clarified.
Therefore, we would like to see an improvement so that it cannot be moved to another folder or deleted.リーガルホールドを設定したコンテンツを別フォルダへの移動や削除が出来ないようにして欲しい
リーガルホールドを設定したコンテンツが現状は移動や削除可能な仕様になっています。
しかし、不正が明確化した状況ではこれは望ましくないです。
そのため、別フォルダへの移動や削除が出来ないように改善してほしい。2 votes -
Additional versioning features
Additional features regarding the version history:
- The ability to manually update the version number of a document on initial upload. This would allow existing version numbers to match version numbers tracked in Box.
- The ability to add the version number tracked in Box to the file name when downloading documents. This would eliminate the need to manually update the version number in file names, which could be prone to error.
2 votes -
Delete User without transferring content when using Retention Policy
【Background】
When a Retention Policy is active and I try to delete a user that does not have a content that is under retention policy, it is required to transfer their content to another user.【Request】
When the user that does not hold an item that is not under retention policy, I would like to have the user deleted without transferring their content.This is because we are currently using an ecosystem called Hakonnect, which manages users, but it returns an error when trying to delete a user with retention policy on.
3 votes -
Delete empty/orphaned parent folders.
Please add the ability to delete empty parent folders that have reached a deletion threshold.
Currently only the contents of the folders are deleted leaving an orphaned empty parent folder that have to be manually deleted.
1 vote -
Delete user without transferring content when using legal hold
【Background】
1. When "Legal Hold" is ON but no "Retention Policy" set
2. When I try to delete a user that is not related to the legal hold above, they need to transfer the content to another user.【Request】
Since it is a user that is not affected by the "Legal Hold", I would like to be able to use that user without transferring the content, which is the behaviour when there is no Governance setting.3 votes -
Ability for Legal Hold to notify user before they drop file in Trash
Ability for Legal Hold to notify user before they drop file in Trash
2 votes -
Option for only owners and co-owners to permanently delete content from trash
This would include an option in the Admin Console > Enterprise Settings > Content & Sharing tab to allow only owners and co-owners to permanently delete content.
1 vote -
Data Residency Zone in Netherlands
We'd like a data residency zone in the Netherlands
1 vote -
Allow Co-Admins to View Only Legal Holds
I'd like to see a checkbox for Co-Admins to see only the Governance tab with only the Legal Holds sub-tab.
Currently you can grant a Co-Admin permission to view and/or edit policies, which gets you close, but it also includes platform and retention policies at this time. It also inexplicably grants them access to a version of the Content tab I've never seen before.
We have a whole department for managing legal holds and conflicts. They have no need to see the data, they just need to know the name of the person or folder that needs to be put…
1 vote
- Don't see your idea?