Anonymous
My feedback
35 results found
-
106 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous supported this idea · -
35 votes
We understand the request, but unfortunately this is not on the near-term roadmap.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedI agree this feature should be prioritized. It's very unfortunate that the response is 'not planned' with the prevalence of iPads / mobile devices in 2023. I hope you re-evaluate that decision.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
2 votesAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedThis is the "ready-sign" link feature, though it's only available to Enterprise Plus customers.
-
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedAgreed this would be great. Frequently we send expiring public links and then the people we send them to later come back to us requesting we re-send the links - but then we're not sure what the original files were.
This would be a huge improvement if only the PUBLIC link expired but it still worked internally...
Anonymous supported this idea · -
5 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedIt's 2023 - I hope your team will reconsider allowing corporate logos to display in a higher resolution. Right now they just look bad and unprofessional - especially in a world where many people have 4k displays now.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
1 voteAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
36 votes
At this point, there is no short to medium-term plan to extend File Request to accept folder uploads. Please continue to upvote/add feedback so we are able to revisit the prioritization at a later time. Thanks!
Anonymous supported this idea · -
14 votes
Thank you for your submission. However, this does not have enough demand in order to be prioritized.
We will reconsider with additional use cases.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedI agree - SCIM provisioning would be a real benefit to allow us to control groups/permissions from our SSO provider. This would be a big benefit.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
1 voteAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
518 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
We are deliberately not doing this in order to provide a secure and compliant posture for the product
Anonymous supported this idea · -
59 votes
This is something we’re considering for the longer term roadmap, but not something we’re exploring in the near-term unless there’s more demand.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedThis would be amazing, please add this.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedAgreed, this would be a great addition.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
I agree that the way Box Sign names files currently is very sub-optimal. Hopefully this can be cleaned up in the future.