Anonymous
My feedback
12 results found
-
21 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
37 votes
Box storage platform already has optimizations in place to intelligently detect active (most recently and frequently used) data, and migrate it to cost-effective tiers. Great suggestion though!
Anonymous supported this idea · -
6 votesAnonymous shared this idea ·
-
23 votes
This is a great suggestion, and I can definitely see the usefulness of such a feature. Based on current priorities, I don’t foresee us being able to implement this feature in the short-term.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
18 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
Box Drive does support co-editing in iWork, but doesn’t support it for any other application type, as it’s dependent on the application vendor.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
37 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
884 votes
Thanks for your feedback. We unfortunately don't have plans to support a Linux client for Box Drive at this time.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
362 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
336 votes
We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.
Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.
We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.
…
Anonymous supported this idea · -
75 votes
We don’t have plans to address this in the short term. We will continue to review this ask in future planning cycles to reconsider!
Anonymous supported this idea · -
20 votes
This feature request isn’t currently planned on the roadmap, but we are considering the notion of user attributes that can be placed on a user and then used for better context while sharing / collaborating and searching in the Admin Console.
Please provide more use cases in the comments to help us understand the problem better.
Anonymous supported this idea ·