Rohit Jain
My feedback
42 results found
-
5 votesRohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Rohit Jain
commented
As per record policy once the a file is under retention or legal hold that file cannot be trashed, changed. At the end of the lifecycle the file either is completed deleted or it is send to National Archives or could be presented in the court of law. There is also an impact to organizational users where when accessing a record for reference or informational purposes they are assuming that it is what it was when the author applied retention to it but the way things work currently anyone can create new version of a record and since by default a preview always shows latest version this can lead to legal complications as the newer version was never under governance. We want users should not be able to do changes to a file once in retention. So a type of retention and legal hold policy that will allow us to restrict ability to make any changes to a file over and beyond the permission sets based on user roles.
Rohit Jain
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesRohit Jain
shared this idea
·
-
291 votesRohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
This is an understandable request, but if fulfilled, would create a situation where users had no way of removing files from view.
An error occurred while saving the comment Rohit Jain
commented
If an file is under retention or legal hold, it must not go away from user's view. In the first place as per our understanding the functionality of trashing content in Box is not intended to remove a content from a user's view, the intention is always to trash the content.
Rohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
90 votes
A box-native metadata table is not currently on the roadmap, but we have launched our metadata query toolkit alongside a content-explorer element that can emulate the same experience.
An error occurred while saving the comment Rohit Jain
commented
When picking templates for assigning to a file they are not alphabetically sorted as it is with folders. We would like the templates to be alphabetically sorted for when picking for file assignment.
Rohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesRohit Jain
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesRohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
98 votesRohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesRohit Jain
shared this idea
·
-
26 votesunder consideration · 1 comment · Help shape the future of Box » Core & Technical Infrastructure · Admin →Rohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesRohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesRohit Jain
shared this idea
·
-
38 votesRohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesRohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesRohit Jain
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteRohit Jain
shared this idea
·
-
9 votes
Box does not currently plan to extend the lookback period fo Enterprise Events.
-
8 votesRohit Jain
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
This is required in the context of Files/Folders under Retention or Legal Hold. We do not want users making any changes to these files for compliance purposes. Sometimes even folders if its created to maintain a final set of documents. Some government records just cannot be modified or moved or deleted until their end of life in the Records Life Cycle.