Anonymous

← Customer Feedback for Box

My feedback

106 results found

  1. Open Shared Link Controls: Default Password Requirements for Open Shared Links

    157 votes
    24 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  AdminAnonymous (Product Executive, Box) responded

    Instead of “require password” security control, we intend to support “Require OTP” requirement for public links (via SMS, Email, or TOTP). I wanted to share where we are headed. We do not plan on delivering this ask as is, but we do intend to solve the security use case behind it.

    Please comment if you disagree.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  2. Enhance Metadata Search for Text field for Japanese language ("contains" instead of "exact match")

    90 votes
    1 comment  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Search  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  AdminTyan Hynes (Admin, Box) responded

    We are planning improvements to how we handle Japanese language queries but this work is not currently on the roadmap in the next 12 months. We will take this into consideration for the annual roadmap for next year.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  3. Download with Metadata

    5 votes
    0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  4. Add Relay Trigger action for Folder Metadata

    12 votes
    1 comment  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Core & Technical Infrastructure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  5. Exact Match for Metadata

    13 votes
    not planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  6. Better visibility for file metadata

    34 votes
    not planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  7. Global Metadata Variable

    26 votes
    1 comment  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  Adminmriley (Admin, Box) responded

    While we recognize the importance of this feature, it is not something we plan to introduce in the near term. We will certainly keep this in mind for future roadmap inclusion and we will keep the status of this request updated to accurately reflect our current position.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  8. Allow an upload of data for Options fields in Metadata templates.

    4 votes
    1 comment  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  9. Classification/Metadata Sorting

    23 votes
    not planned  ·  4 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  10. Required Metadata - Require Metadata Upon Upload by End User

    93 votes
    not planned  ·  12 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  11. Dependent metadata fields

    20 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  12. Metadata table(row: files, column: metadata keys)

    89 votes
    5 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Metadata  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  AdminSam Miller (Admin, Box) responded

    A box-native metadata table is not currently on the roadmap, but we have launched our metadata query toolkit alongside a content-explorer element that can emulate the same experience.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  13. Box for Teams Integration for Private Channels

    81 votes
    2 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Partner Integrations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  AdminAnonymous (Admin, Box) responded

    This limitation is due to Microsoft’s platform not allowing integrations to surface as messaging extensions (Box icon to upload and share documents). Until Microsoft supports this for third parties, Box is unable to deliver this functionality. We are working with Microsoft but there is no timeline for delivery at this point.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  14. Allow for creation of custom permission levels (roles).

    14 votes
    not planned  ·  1 comment  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Core & Technical Infrastructure  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  15. Ability to download comments and print comments

    76 votes
    under consideration  ·  13 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Preview  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  16. Collaborators Page (Item-Level) -- Add Ability to Sort by Column Headers / Filter by External Collab

    58 votes
    7 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Web App  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  17. Support External Users in Box Groups

    399 votes
    on roadmap  ·  20 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Admin Console  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  18. Auto-Created 'All Users' Group

    38 votes
    5 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Admin Console  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  19. Want files that are classified by "Azure Information Protection" can be previewed in Box.

    6 votes
    0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Partner Integrations  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

  20. Map AD groups to co-admin roles

    6 votes
    0 comments  ·  Help shape the future of Box » Admin Console  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  katiele responded

    This does sound like a huge burden for admins and I’d like to hear more about how you’d use existing AD groups to grant co-admin permissions. We are looking into extending our APIs to allow admins to set co-admin permissions, which may alleviate the pain of setting the permissions manually.

    However, we don’t currently have any plans to take the AD groups and map them to co-admin permissions at this time.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
1 2 3 5

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)

By entering and viewing this page, you agree to be bound by (1) UserVoice Terms of Service and the (2) Box Community Terms of Use. In the event of a direct conflict between the foregoing terms of service with respect to the Box Community Guidelines, Feedback and Suggestions, the Box Community Terms of Use shall take precedence as between you and Box.