Anonymous
My feedback
18 results found
-
3 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
18 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
44 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
145 votes
Instead of “require password” security control, we intend to support “Require OTP” requirement for public links (via SMS, Email, or TOTP). I wanted to share where we are headed. We do not plan on delivering this ask as is, but we do intend to solve the security use case behind it.
Please comment if you disagree.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
334 votes
We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.
Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.
We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.
…
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
388 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
391 votes
We understand the request, but unfortunately this is not on the near-term roadmap.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
108 votes
This is not technically possible with the current non-persistent architecture of Box Drive.
When the ‘Box’ folder disappears (whens users quit, update, log out) Windows folder redirection creates a new ‘Box’ folder to continue to redirect content. This forks the redirection out of Box Drive.
Workarounds have been investigated heavily, but the cost to implement is too large to commit to the roadmap now.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This is critical
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
202 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This is keeping us from rolling out Box Sign as it is far too problematic to support random suppressions and have no idea until the user asks.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
93 votes
Thanks for the thoughtful suggestion (and mock-up!). At this time, it’s not planned, but we’ll keep this in mind for future enhancements to the product!
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
176 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This is a requirement for anyone who actually wants to use the Box for Google Workspace application. The amount of spam generated by simply moving documents from Google is a major disincentive and users are opting to stick with Drive.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
Not being able to link to Box files/folders inside a Box product is a surprising omission. Even being able to add URLs would help here.