Anonymous
My feedback
21 results found
-
10 votes
This suggestion is under consideration by the Product Team for future development, however, it is not on our roadmap. Please share additional feedback and use cases to help us understand the importance of this release.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
121 votes
Hello! Changing status on this feature as we have it in our roadmap but we plan to make it in 2-3 quarters. We will keep you updated.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
193 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
3 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
We are researching into this feature, thank you!
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
we are researching into this feature. We will get back to you!
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
166 votes
Instead of “require password” security control, we intend to support “Require OTP” requirement for public links (via SMS, Email, or TOTP). I wanted to share where we are headed. We do not plan on delivering this ask as is, but we do intend to solve the security use case behind it.
Please comment if you disagree.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
344 votes
We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.
Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.
We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.
…
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
411 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
429 votes
We understand the request, but unfortunately this is not on the near-term roadmap.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
36 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
93 votes
Thanks for the thoughtful suggestion (and mock-up!). At this time, it’s not planned, but we’ll keep this in mind for future enhancements to the product!
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This is a requirement for anyone who actually wants to use the Box for Google Workspace application. The amount of spam generated by simply moving documents from Google is a major disincentive and users are opting to stick with Drive.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
Not being able to link to Box files/folders inside a Box product is a surprising omission. Even being able to add URLs would help here.