Matt Stofka

My feedback

197 results found

  1. 27 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  2. 7 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  3. 17 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  4. 14 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  5. 26 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  6. 19 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  7. 59 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  8. 57 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  9. 10 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  10. 57 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  11. 31 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  12. 161 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  13. 401 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt Stofka commented  · 

    Glad to see this is on the roadmap finally. External groups would really help with managing access and making it easier to remove external collaborators. Ideally our users would be able to create their own groups or at least allow Admins to create the groups and assign a user to be a group admin without giving them any other co-admin privileges.

    Side note: in a closed file structure (i.e., non-admins aren't allowed to create root folders), giving a user any co-admin privileges at all would bypass this so they would be able to create top-level folders. So if you are thinking of making external group management as a co-admin function, please keep this in mind. I wouldn't want them to be actual "co-admins" which would bypass that root folder setting. Hope that makes sense. Thx.

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  14. 2 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt Stofka commented  · 

    Agreed! One of our users wanted to schedule a task to go out on the 15th of each month, but it only allows 1st or last day. We'd like to see various options like:

    1) Repeat every X day/week/month/year on the X day of the month

    AND

    2) Repeat every X (Day/Week/Month/Year) on the (First/Second/Third/Fourth/Last) (day of the week)

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  15. 69 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  16. 2 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  17. 9 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  18. 8 votes
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  Brad Monroe responded

    We don’t currently have this slotted in as an update to the Trash page given limited asks for it. If customer demand persists, we will re-evaluate, though this change also requires an API update since https://developer.box.com/v2.0/reference#restore-a-trashed-item only allows choosing of a new target parent folder in the case where the original parent has been deleted or user lost access.

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  19. 71 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt Stofka commented  · 

    Hope this is still under consideration. It's so difficult to identify the correct content to restore as it's quite possible to have multiple items in Trash with the same or similar name. We need to see the folder path from which the item was deleted to determine if it's the correct item to restore AND know which folder it'll be restored to. The current functionality assumes that the user is a single user with no collaborators and isn't part of a business or enterprise where they may have access to many GB or TB of content with often deeply-nested folder paths. So this really needs more attention.

    Also, PLEASE REMOVE THE "RESTORE ALL" BUTTON ALTOGETHER. Pretty Please!!!!!

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  20. 3 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 9 10

Feedback and Knowledge Base