Skip to content

Matt Stofka

My feedback

188 results found

  1. 383 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt Stofka commented  · 

    Glad to see this is on the roadmap finally. External groups would really help with managing access and making it easier to remove external collaborators. Ideally our users would be able to create their own groups or at least allow Admins to create the groups and assign a user to be a group admin without giving them any other co-admin privileges.

    Side note: in a closed file structure (i.e., non-admins aren't allowed to create root folders), giving a user any co-admin privileges at all would bypass this so they would be able to create top-level folders. So if you are thinking of making external group management as a co-admin function, please keep this in mind. I wouldn't want them to be actual "co-admins" which would bypass that root folder setting. Hope that makes sense. Thx.

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  2. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt Stofka commented  · 

    Agreed! One of our users wanted to schedule a task to go out on the 15th of each month, but it only allows 1st or last day. We'd like to see various options like:

    1) Repeat every X day/week/month/year on the X day of the month

    AND

    2) Repeat every X (Day/Week/Month/Year) on the (First/Second/Third/Fourth/Last) (day of the week)

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  3. 61 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  5. 9 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  6. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    not planned  ·  Brad Monroe responded

    We don’t currently have this slotted in as an update to the Trash page given limited asks for it. If customer demand persists, we will re-evaluate, though this change also requires an API update since https://developer.box.com/v2.0/reference#restore-a-trashed-item only allows choosing of a new target parent folder in the case where the original parent has been deleted or user lost access.

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  7. 64 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt Stofka commented  · 

    Hope this is still under consideration. It's so difficult to identify the correct content to restore as it's quite possible to have multiple items in Trash with the same or similar name. We need to see the folder path from which the item was deleted to determine if it's the correct item to restore AND know which folder it'll be restored to. The current functionality assumes that the user is a single user with no collaborators and isn't part of a business or enterprise where they may have access to many GB or TB of content with often deeply-nested folder paths. So this really needs more attention.

    Also, PLEASE REMOVE THE "RESTORE ALL" BUTTON ALTOGETHER. Pretty Please!!!!!

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  9. 15 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  10. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt Stofka commented  · 

    This demo that zslavik posted was great...and yeah it's a problem. That "Restore All" button is fine for individual user accounts, but should be eliminated for users on Enterprise Accounts who have access to lots of shared folders and may have many years of deleted items in their trash. It would be an nightmare to fix if an end-user tapped that button.

    There's another Pulse thread about removing the "Restore All" function altogether (or my suggestion of allowing Admins to disable it for non-admins):
    https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778-help-shape-the-future-of-box/suggestions/47031214-remove-the-restore-all-from-the-users-trash-page

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  11. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Matt Stofka commented  · 

    Yes, perhaps provide an option in Enterprise Settings to remove the "Restore All" button for end users so that each organization choose what's best for them. I'm waiting for the day that one of our users taps that button and it's going to be an absolute nightmare to fix.

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  12. 1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  13. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  14. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  15. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  16. 4 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    not planned  ·  tosin responded

    Thank you for this request!

    We will review this with additional demand.

    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  17. 58 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  18. 21 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  19. 36 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
  20. 2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Matt Stofka supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1 3 4 5 9 10

Feedback and Knowledge Base