Anonymous

My feedback

72 results found

  1. 101 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 105 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  3. 28 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Thank you for the suggestion. We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap.

    Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 45 votes
    How important is this to you?

    Thank you for the suggestion. We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap.

    Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  5. 28 votes
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  Anonymous responded

    This is technical not feasible. Microsoft has not enabled the APIs that we need to leverage on mac.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 38 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  7. 75 votes
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  Anonymous responded

    We don’t have plans to address this in the short term. We will continue to review this ask in future planning cycles to reconsider!

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 35 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  9. 142 votes
    How important is this to you?

    We are on track towards fixing this. We have made significant improvements in our Files, and Folder counts and their related sizes. They now happen in a near realtime speed and we also have a redundant process that runs and fixes these counts nightly. The current improvements are visible in most of your folders browsing experience and the enterprise level counts. We are in process of fixing counts that you can see for a given user, this will release in Calendar year 2024'Q3. There are also few minor improvements planned for the last quarter of the year.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  10. 291 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  11. 11 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  12. 43 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  13. 198 votes
    How important is this to you?

    We understand the request, but unfortunately this is not on the near-term roadmap. We are currently prioritizing automatically locking/unlocking files on Box Drive for Office files on Windows. We will revisit this feature in the future.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  14. 21 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  15. 21 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  16. 54 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  17. 51 votes
    How important is this to you?

    We’re not planning a ‘fast switch’ option to allow a user to easily switch between 2 different Box accounts on Box Drive while maintaining all cached data. The only option we have now is that users can ‘logout’ of their current account and sign into another account, but the caveat is that this will delete all their local cached data/MFO settings from Box Drive

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  18. 75 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  19. 161 votes
    How important is this to you?
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  20. 337 votes
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  Anonymous responded

    We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.

    Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.

    We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base