Anonymous
My feedback
98 results found
-
30 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
43 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
83 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
12 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
14 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
47 votes
We're actively considering several initiatives to increase visibility around large folder operations, including notification mechanisms to track the status of such operations.
Please continue to share your feedback to help us prioritise this idea.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
81 votes
Hello all,
Thanks for requesting this feature. The product team reviewed this request and added to our backlog for consideration. We look to revisit this next year and once we start working on this, we will update the status.
Thanks,
Nirmal
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
28 votes
Hello All,
We do not have this feature planned in short team and have this feature in the backlog for next year. We will consider this again next year and reach out for input and feedback.
Thanks,
Nirmal
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commented
This option would be helpful to allow tasks to be set as reminders on documents like contract review in preparation for cancelation or renewal, scheduled payments, review of policy, procedure, knowledge documents for accuracy and relevancy, as well as instructions for scheduled audits/compliance-related tasks.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commented
It would be very helpful to be able to search by content in multiple metadata templates at the same time using boolean logic as well as full and partial key word searches.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Anonymous shared this idea ·
-
62 votes
This capability is partially available depending on the specifics on Conditional Access policies. At the moment we support it under the "Require device compliance" grant, and we aim to cover the "Require app protection policy" grant in upcoming quarters.
We'd kindly appreciate to hear from you in case you are using any additional grant, as we understand the relevance of this capability for your security posture.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
Anonymous shared this idea ·
-
117 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
7 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
This would also help from a security standpoint. Instead of just adding someone as CC where the person gets viewer access to the report , we could create specific shared folders that makes sense when sharing with a group or where you want to save related reports for ease of viewing. Additionally, giving permissions as a CC on each report and/or run of a report, it it can difficult to see who has been given access to what without running auditing reports.