Anonymous
My feedback
290 results found
-
174 votes
This capability is not currently planned, but we’ll keep you updated here. Thank you for your feedback!
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
30 votes
This is currently not planned but we will re-evaluate priorities in Q3/Q4 of FY23
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
43 votes
Thank you for the suggestion. We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. We will place this in our backlog as we continue evaluating ideas to improve Box Drive.
Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
8 votes
We have an internal initiative to scale up this and several other metrics. And we have made significant progress in terms of the number of items that can be stored in a Folder. I am happy to report that our research have shown that our infrastructure can easily scale up to 1 Billion items in a single Folder.
Since this initiative is underway, we are in the process of understanding how such a scale impacts the usability of our first party applications that sits on top of our platform. However, accessing such large number of items on a single folder via our APIs should be straightforward.
Disclaimer: We are not yet committing that such scale limits will be available to all pricing tiers.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
24 votes
Due to other higher priorities, we are not considering this item at this time.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
32 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
This feature is not currently planned for our roadmap in FY24.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
111 votes
This is still on our roadmap and is under development.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
9 votesgathering feedback · 1 comment · Help shape the future of Box » Core & Technical Infrastructure · Admin →
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
69 votes
This is not planned in the near future due to other higher priority initiatives.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
66 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
23 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
Thank you for this suggestion. I understand the use case. However, we do not plan to accommodate that level of customization at this time.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
This is not currently prioritized. We will reconsider with additional use cases and demand.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
72 votes
Not planned for now. When we update admin login flow in FY20 H2, this will be under consideration.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Anonymous
supported this idea
·