BlackRoseEvy
My feedback
46 results found
-
556 votes
Hi all,
We are currently working on the ability to hide certain folders in Box Drive on your desktop, allowing you to see only the folders that are important to you.
We will keep you updated on our progress here.
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
25 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
101 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment BlackRoseEvy commented
This feature would also be highly useful for the University of Arizona. Different departments manage their own content and have varying versioning needs. Some situations require a limit of 50 versions, while others need up to 500.
The ability to set granular versioning permissions at the file, folder, or group level would address these needs as well as streamline and enhance content management across our organization.
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
We do not plan to add more permissions / roles at this time.
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
411 votes
We understand the request, but unfortunately this is not on the near-term roadmap.
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
BlackRoseEvy shared this idea ·
-
48 votes
This idea is on our this year's roadmap
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
49 votes
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
69 votes
please reach out to hubs-research@box.com to share more information on your feedback
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
-
80 votes
We have this feature on our this year's roadmap
BlackRoseEvy supported this idea ·
We are facing challenges in gaining confidence to enable the AI tool due to the nature of its current access controls. While we can exclude or allow individual user access to AI, the concern primarily revolves around protecting specific content. For example, even if AI is disabled for an individual, any shared content they own can still be processed by AI if accessed by another user with AI enabled.
We are awaiting a response from the privacy office regarding acceptance of the risks associated with AI and HIPAA-protected content. If the risk is not approved, we may need to disable AI features for all users who have access to HIPAA data. Unfortunately, this would prevent those users from leveraging AI features for their non-HIPAA-related content as well.
It would be highly beneficial to have greater flexibility in managing AI accessibility at a more granular level. Are there any roadmap items or plans to address the following potential solutions?
• Allowing content owners to tag specific files to exclude them from AI processing
• Allowing content owners to tag folders for AI exclusion
• Leveraging classification policies to prevent specific data types from being processed by AI
These capabilities would help ensure compliance while enabling broader use of AI for non-sensitive content.
Thank you.