matsumoto
My feedback
97 results found
-
5 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
3 votes
Hello! This functionality is already planned for development.
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
60 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
228 votes
We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
127 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
14 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
3 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
5 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
11 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
We are adding a User field type as a Metadata capability in FY26.
matsumoto supported this idea ·