matsumoto
My feedback
93 results found
-
2 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
10 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
11 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
228 votes
We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
125 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
8 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
13 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
3 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
5 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
matsumoto shared this idea ·
-
11 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
13 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
9 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
We are adding a User field type as a Metadata capability in FY26.
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
17 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·
-
4 votes
matsumoto supported this idea ·