Matt Stofka
My feedback
207 results found
-
58 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
17 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
33 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
This task is still on our roadmap but we had to reprioritize it to next quarter.
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
We currently gather the feedback about this request. Please, notify your manager if you can provide an additional details and use cases to this request. This will help us to build the best version on Hubs!
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
35 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
162 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
412 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment
Matt Stofka
commented
Agreed! One of our users wanted to schedule a task to go out on the 15th of each month, but it only allows 1st or last day. We'd like to see various options like:
1) Repeat every X day/week/month/year on the X day of the month
AND
2) Repeat every X (Day/Week/Month/Year) on the (First/Second/Third/Fourth/Last) (day of the week)
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
82 votes
This is still on the roadmap.
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
We don’t currently have this slotted in as an update to the Trash page given limited asks for it. If customer demand persists, we will re-evaluate, though this change also requires an API update since https://developer.box.com/v2.0/reference#restore-a-trashed-item only allows choosing of a new target parent folder in the case where the original parent has been deleted or user lost access.
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
Matt Stofka
supported this idea
·
Glad to see this is on the roadmap finally. External groups would really help with managing access and making it easier to remove external collaborators. Ideally our users would be able to create their own groups or at least allow Admins to create the groups and assign a user to be a group admin without giving them any other co-admin privileges.
Side note: in a closed file structure (i.e., non-admins aren't allowed to create root folders), giving a user any co-admin privileges at all would bypass this so they would be able to create top-level folders. So if you are thinking of making external group management as a co-admin function, please keep this in mind. I wouldn't want them to be actual "co-admins" which would bypass that root folder setting. Hope that makes sense. Thx.