Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box)
My feedback
41 results found
-
45 votesAdminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
38 votes
We’ve been focusing on making the following improvement to Box Groups instead: allowing external users to be added to groups (https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778/suggestions/35982226) and using groups for granting access to apps and enterprise settings (https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778/suggestions/36670615).
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
61 votes
Additional categorization and prioritization is not currently planned for our Tasks feature at this time. Please continue to leave feedback on use cases for consideration in future planning cycles.
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
9 votes
Thanks for the suggestion. Please continue to post use cases and feedback, to help us prioritize for a future release.
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
47 votesAdminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
72 votes
Not planned as MSFT doesnt have API’s for us to build this integration. Would request all customers to provide feedback to your respective MSFT reps
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
3 votes
We are planning to add a setting that allows the Admin to hide the parent folder path for all Box folders mapped to Salesforce records in the main Box component.
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) shared this idea · -
16 votes
This feature is not currently planned for our roadmap in FY24.
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
393 votesAdminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
21 votes
Currently the ability to mark folders for offline access is supported.
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
9 votesAdminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
3 votesAdminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
21 votesAdminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
20 votes
Interesting suggestion, but we’re not able to prioritize this given competing priorities.
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
886 votes
Thanks for your feedback. We unfortunately don't have plans to support a Linux client for Box Drive at this time.
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
54 votesAdminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
336 votes
We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.
Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.
We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.
…
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
22 votes
We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!
Adminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea · -
23 votesAdminmikephillips (Admin, Box) supported this idea ·
-
7 votesAdminmikephillips (Admin, Box) shared this idea ·