Anonymous
My feedback
98 results found
-
23 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
91 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
20 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
89 votes
A box-native metadata table is not currently on the roadmap, but we have launched our metadata query toolkit alongside a content-explorer element that can emulate the same experience.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
76 votes
This limitation is due to Microsoft’s platform not allowing integrations to surface as messaging extensions (Box icon to upload and share documents). Until Microsoft supports this for third parties, Box is unable to deliver this functionality. We are working with Microsoft but there is no timeline for delivery at this point.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
11 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
67 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
Collaborators Page (Item-Level) -- Add Ability to Sort by Column Headers / Filter by External Collab
58 votesDue to other higher priority items, we are not planning on this at this time.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
383 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
36 votes
We’ve been focusing on making the following improvement to Box Groups instead: allowing external users to be added to groups (https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778/suggestions/35982226) and using groups for granting access to apps and enterprise settings (https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778/suggestions/36670615).
Anonymous supported this idea · -
6 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
This does sound like a huge burden for admins and I’d like to hear more about how you’d use existing AD groups to grant co-admin permissions. We are looking into extending our APIs to allow admins to set co-admin permissions, which may alleviate the pain of setting the permissions manually.
However, we don’t currently have any plans to take the AD groups and map them to co-admin permissions at this time.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
5 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
54 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
60 votes
This capability is partially available depending on the specifics on Conditional Access policies. At the moment we support it under the "Require device compliance" grant, and we aim to cover the "Require app protection policy" grant in upcoming quarters.
We'd kindly appreciate to hear from you in case you are using any additional grant, as we understand the relevance of this capability for your security posture.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
8 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
30 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
14 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·