Jeff Hunn
My feedback
20 results found
-
13 votes
This is currently not planned, but we will consider with additional customer demand.
Jeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
73 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
80 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeff Hunn
commented
This would help us remove a custom script we had to create as we do this quarterly today but it is inefficient. We require users to review their shared content, particularly external, so this would be a nice add.
Jeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
98 votes
Due to other higher priority items, this has been deprioritized.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeff Hunn
commented
This would be a great add. We have users asking about this item lately as they adopt Box more and more. We also recommend leveraging our process for Box Groups but it is inefficient to remove many collaborators today.
Jeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
162 votes
This is a great suggestion and one we’re considering for the future!
Jeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
69 votes
Enterprise, Enterprise +, and grandfathered Relay full users are now able to transfer workflows
Jeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
Create a Box group/alias or ability to select a different name to replace the workflow owner’s name.
111 votesWe are conducting user feedback sessions to gather more information
Jeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
359 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
22 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
Customers can utilize the existing events infrastructure to gather this data, so we do not have any plans to provide snapshots in fewer API calls in the short term.
Jeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
43 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
544 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
At this time, we are developing solutions for using groups to grant access to apps and enterprise settings. https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778/suggestions/36670615
Supporting nested groups may be a longer term vision that we consider after solving the first problem above.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jeff Hunn
commented
We have existing groups for teams and departments. These in turn roll up into larger organizational units which are comprised of these smaller groups. Within Box today we need to take an export of each of these smaller groups to create those larger department and business groups and requires a separate load script to do this. It would be much cleaner to allow a Box group to contain another Box group.
Jeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
292 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
-
28 votesJeff Hunn
supported this idea
·
Being able to default this based on the users profile or enterprise setting would be great. Better, get Auto to actually change the quality similar to YouTube and other video sites: take connection speed and player size into account.