Michael Miller
My feedback
15 results found
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Miller
supported this idea
·
-
91 votes
Thanks for the feedback. Collections are going to remain as personalized views in the near future. We may revisit this down the road.
Michael Miller
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Miller
commented
Even if it was an admin only feature where you could create collections, say for company resource, and share to groups would go a long way.
-
33 votes
At this point, there is no short to medium-term plan to extend File Request to accept folder uploads. Please continue to upvote/add feedback so we are able to revisit the prioritization at a later time. Thanks!
Michael Miller
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Miller
commented
Must have feature :)
-
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Miller
commented
This can be accomplished with a new share permission for 'Folder Visible'. A user may have Edit permissions on a sub folder say 4 levels down, but you could invite them to the parent folder (4 levels up) with Folder Visible. They would only see folder tree leading them down to where they had more elevated permissions. In addition you could have a setting on the Folder as well. This gives less finite control, but that work in some instances and the Folder Visible in other instances.
This would be great for our organization where we often pool resources from other offices where those users would not be invited to the parent Active Jobs folder (containing hundred of jobs). Then we could invite them as Editor for only the jobs they are working on and invite as Folder Visible up stream to the Active Jobs folder. This way that user from the other office would see the Active Jobs folder for the other office and only see the jobs they are helping with within that folder. Currently all those job folders appear in their All Files and the list can grow to hundreds with no organization or senses of which office they are for. Another way to keep the All Files much cleaner.
Michael Miller
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Miller
commented
This is a great idea.
Michael Miller
supported this idea
·
-
27 votes
Unfortunately this is not on the near-term roadmap, that being said this is a very interesting request which we may consider in the mid-long term.
-
5 votes
-
1 vote
-
1 vote
-
19 votes
We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!
Box Shield may be a potential workaround for users interested in restricting syncing of specific content by classifying it. Though this will also prevent any downloads of the content as well.
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Miller
commented
This is a needed feature to prevent users syncing or marking data offline and to prevent easy data theft. Box Shield does not do the same thing. I believe you (Kyle) are referring to Box Governance features. If you put a classification on the 'upper level' folder, then all the sub folders inherit the classification. So you would have to go to every sub folder (and newly created ones) and put a different classification on it.
I'd like to the spec look something like this on the Folder Settings:
We have a many folders where we have to give users Edit permissions to the ’top level’ folder where hundreds/ thousands of subfolders are created with potentially several hundred thousands of files. It would be great to a folder setting for:
> Prevent Downloading, Syncing and Offline Access
With an option to > Apply to Subfolders Yes/ No (or checkbox)
This way users could not simply select the ’top level’ folder and purposely or by accident download, sync or mark for offline (drive). We have had many instances when users select ’top level’ folder and attempt to sync or mark for offline access and that triggers hundreds of gigabytes that fills up their HD space and causes a support ticket. Also would help reduce mass data theft.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Michael Miller
commented
This is a serious reporting issue affecting both Box reporting, which becomes more useless because of this as well as CASB monitoring tools.
Michael Miller
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes
-
486 votes
-
308 votes
This suggestion is under consideration by the Product Team for future development, however, it is not on our roadmap. Please share additional feedback and use cases to help us understand the importance of this release.
Same issue. Would be nice if that location could be a location that users don't have access to and or turn off the Save Location when using a template, so it only goes to the users My Signed Documents. The way it is now, given user must have View permissions to the folder where the template is saved, if the user does not change the Save Location when using the template, then the files are saved to the same location where the Template is saved where all users have View permissions. Hence all the users can see all the signed documents that are saved there.
The Save Location when users are using a Template should also be a "lockable" field.