Anonymous
My feedback
21 results found
-
1 voteAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
108 votes
This is not technically possible with the current non-persistent architecture of Box Drive.
When the ‘Box’ folder disappears (whens users quit, update, log out) Windows folder redirection creates a new ‘Box’ folder to continue to redirect content. This forks the redirection out of Box Drive.
Workarounds have been investigated heavily, but the cost to implement is too large to commit to the roadmap now.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
114 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
503 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
48 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
234 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
39 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
We’re not planning a ‘fast switch’ option to allow a user to easily switch between 2 different Box accounts on Box Drive while maintaining all cached data. The only option we have now is that users can ‘logout’ of their current account and sign into another account, but the caveat is that this will delete all their local cached data/MFO settings from Box Drive
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
157 votes
Thanks for the feedback! Users already have the ability to selectively sync (mark content for offline access) today in Box Drive. What I believe you’re asking for is a curated view of content you select to show up in Box Drive. That’s something we’re considering as we think about how to solve the content sprawl issue in Box Drive.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
290 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
334 votes
We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.
Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.
We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.
…
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
343 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
879 votes
Thanks for your feedback. We unfortunately don't have plans to support a Linux client for Box Drive at this time.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
52 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
30 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteAnonymous
shared this idea
·
Creating an app like this may get you more customers (Just Saying) :)