Anonymous
My feedback
92 results found
-
58 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
28 votes
This is technical not feasible. Microsoft has not enabled the APIs that we need to leverage on mac.
-
37 votes
We do not have near-term plans to add this capability right now. You might be able to get a similar effect by using Device Trust on those endpoints and requiring a specific certificate on a device, which is limited to just those groups of users.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
149 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
57 votes
Thanks for the feedback and please do keep it coming. Support for offline access for Notes is not currently on our roadmap, however we are researching possible technical solutions and will revisit in the future.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
332 votes
We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.
Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.
We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.
…
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
872 votes
Thanks for your feedback. We unfortunately don't have plans to support a Linux client for Box Drive at this time.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
You are deprecating Box sync and not adding pinning to Box Drive so I don't quite understand the Box response on this.
"For the second half of this year, we are looking into which functionality should be self-serve for the end user without having to go through the admin every time. This is one of the functionalities that are under consideration."
-
40 votes
Due to other higher priority initiatives, this is not prioritized at this time.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This is such a huge problem!
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Every external collaborator we work with has this issue. Box refuses to acknowledge or fix it.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
All or nothing is a horrible oversight.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
69 votes
This feature is currently available for the Box internal apps.
The plan for 3rd party is on the roadamap.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This is a bigger problem than Betas. Box needs this functionality across the board. Wanna try out Box Drive for just a few users? TOO Bad, it enables it for the entire tenant.
Wanna enable integration with a 3rd party app? All or nothing.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
I've been waiting since 2010 for this feature
-
531 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Even though this is the point of Box Drive, to show you all of what you have on the web, I agree. Most users only have 4-5 folders actually synced out of the 100+ folders they are collaborators on. It's pretty annoying to have all that noise show on their devices, especially if they only go into some of those folders once a year. God I hope Box sync never goes away.
-
4 votes
Box cannot enforce pin codes on third-party apps.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
46 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
49 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
19 votes
We currently do not have this planned on our roadmap. Please keep the feedback & use cases coming to help us prioritize this in the future!
Box Shield may be a potential workaround for users interested in restricting syncing of specific content by classifying it. Though this will also prevent any downloads of the content as well.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
54 votes
This is the natural behavior for lexicographic sorting which treats everything as a string. We are unlikely to change this behavior in the near- or mid-term.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
36 votes
We’ve been focusing on making the following improvement to Box Groups instead: allowing external users to be added to groups (https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778/suggestions/35982226) and using groups for granting access to apps and enterprise settings (https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778/suggestions/36670615).
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
-
38 votes
Shield's download and print restrictions can prevent non owner/co-owner collaborators from downloading sensitive content based on classification and still allow them to open/edit the file with Office Online.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
Never gonna get it, Never gonna get it.