John Nickell
My feedback
48 results found
-
20 votesJohn Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteJohn Nickell
shared this idea
·
-
25 votes
We are conducting user feedback sessions to gather more information
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
43 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
I could have sworn that previously all of my folders were sorted by date (most recent first) now they seem to be sorted by name. I'm not sure if something changed or I'm misremembering, but it's pretty annoying to sort a folder by update date (recent first) and then need to do it for each of the subfolders that I'm navigating through.
John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
I could have sworn that previously all of my folders were sorted by date (most recent first) now they seem to be sorted by name. I'm not sure if something changed or I'm misremembering, but it's pretty annoying to sort a folder by update date (recent first) and then need to do it for each of the subfolders that I'm navigating through.
John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
41 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
I could have sworn that previously all of my folders were sorted by date (most recent first) now they seem to be sorted by name. I'm not sure if something changed or I'm misremembering, but it's pretty annoying to sort a folder by update date (recent first) and then need to do it for each of the subfolders that I'm navigating through.
John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
I could have sworn that previously all of my folders were sorted by date (most recent first) now they seem to be sorted by name. I'm not sure if something changed or I'm misremembering, but it's pretty annoying to sort a folder by update date (recent first) and then need to do it for each of the subfolders that I'm navigating through.
John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesJohn Nickell
shared this idea
·
-
115 votesJohn Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
25 votesJohn Nickell
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
My use/need is for powershell Box CLI, but we could also benefit from a single endpoint to get all items within a folder recursively. Trying to build the logic and wait for multiple API calls to return makes this very tiresome.
In our use case we are trying to get count of all files in a directory. At present we have to limit to just the total overall file count. I would envision this API endpoint enabling us to see count of files _by_type_ as well. -
8 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
Same general gist as request: 39483574. But if the external user is given a url that specifies the metadata template, they can search on that metadata template.
Not sure if this is a loophole or a workaround.John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
If the same external user is given a URL that has the metadata template already specified they can then search on that one metadata template. Is this a workaround or a loophole?
John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteJohn Nickell
shared this idea
·
-
149 votes
This is a great suggestion and one we’re considering for the future!
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
This idea sounds really similar to this one that just got promoted to "researching"
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
If possible this could leverage Box Edit's access to the local machine?
John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
49 votes
This change would require a shift to a completely new architecture, which is not planned at this time.
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
OneDrive is leveraging this "new architecture", please consider investing the time in 'modernizing' the application. Not only could it improve the issue with Overlay limit, I'm guessing it might also address issues where a user pinning a folder/item to their Quick access loses visibility of Box ovelay status.
Additionally a BIG win of this might be conveying to Box Drive users if a file/folder they are looking at is shared with others.
Don't know how much the two are related, but OneDrive also allows shorcuts/bookmarks to be visible on the Desktop client. Another win!John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
10 votesJohn Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
4 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
This is "doable" now, but the results are inconsistent. Sometimes a quick access link will take you to a version of the folder where you cannot see the Box Drive overlays (like file upload errors) other times you can. The inconsistency causes confusion
John Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
173 votesJohn Nickell
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteJohn Nickell
shared this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment John Nickell
commented
This would be beneficial to help promote use of webapp instead of Box Drive where this kind of experience is native to Windows Explorer/Finder.
We have a similar use case as the original poster.
John Nickell
supported this idea
·
kind of stunned this isn't an option.