Anonymous
My feedback
31 results found
-
21 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
2 votes
-
23 votes
This is a great suggestion, and I can definitely see the usefulness of such a feature. Based on current priorities, I don’t foresee us being able to implement this feature in the short-term.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
49 votes
This change would require a shift to a completely new architecture, which is not planned at this time.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
18 votes
Thank you for the feedback here -we are considering various ways to split shared/owned content & are considering this for the future roadmap, but don’t currently have a timeline for this.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
80 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
33 votes
This will be considered for the FY24 roadmap, not planned for FY23
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
23 votes
For now, we are focussed on solving bulk management issues with Shared Links.
Box Shield is an additional option for enforcing granular controls on content.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
29 votes
Thanks for the suggestion of this addition. We are not currently planning to add this functionality, but will keep the post updated for future.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
37 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
337 votes
We are currently not planning to implement this feature and will continue to prevent all Box Drive results from appearing in Explorer/Finder searches.
Box Drive does not download the all of the metadata (File name, folder structure, etc.) of your Box content. Instead, it is downloaded on demand and then evicted when it is no longer relevant. This eviction process is not visible to users and it is not easily predictable. This would cause the search results in Explorer/Finder to be inconsistent for users – sometimes they would find a file and other times they may not if the metadata and file were evicted.
We have chosen not to download all of the metadata (and then keep it up to date with changes) as this can result in a large performance, storage and bandwidth tax which is not scalable – especially in environments where users interface with millions of files/folders.
…
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
303 votes
Hi there,
This ability is not currently planned but will be revisited in the future. Thanks for sharing your feedback!
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
365 votes
Hi there,
This capability is under consideration. Check back here for updates.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
52 votes
Thank you for your feedback. Unfortunately, we do not have plans to add support for Linux to the web app at this time. We’ll continue to monitor this thread to gauge interest, and will post updates should our plans change in the future.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
6 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
183 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
109 votes
Moving shared folders is not on the near-term roadmap. We understand the massive importance and we hope that a new product development to be released in 2020 will help address content sprawl.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
33 votes
This is not something that we have on the roadmap for the foreseeable future. Notifications were suppressed for these items and we will be investigating different ways to make problem items in general more discoverable.
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
400 votes
Anonymous supported this idea ·
-
46 votes
Anonymous shared this idea ·