Skip to content

Help shape the future of Box

Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!

See user guide here.

What problem could Box solve for you?

(thinking…)

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

If a similar idea already exists, you can support and comment on it.

If it doesn't exist, you can post your idea so others can support it.

Enter your idea and we'll search to see if someone has already suggested it.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

395 results found

  1. IP Whitelisting enhancement - Provide Preview access if user accesses outside of allowed IP range

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  jfan responded

    We do not currently plan to implement this, but would consider looking at it as part of Device Trust. That is, the IP range outside of the whitelist would be considered “untrusted” for the purposes of Box access.

  2. Additional timeframes under 'Password Resets' from 30-60-90 all the way up to 1 year.

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  3. Segment application of Strong Passwords and apply Reset passwords reqs to External Users

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  4. Modify Drop Down when Selecting Collaboration Role

    Ability to change drop down order to role with "least" rights coming first when adding user to sharing (i.e. default to less rather than most).

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  5. Whitelist external collaborators on an individual managed user basis as opposed to a global basis

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  jfan responded

    This is not currently planned. We will reconsider with additional use case data and customer demand.

  6. Support for Certs to be based on Issued By, Expiration, and or Revocation

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  7. Use Device Trust to prevent users from being able to download a significant quantity of files/folders

    Use Device Trust to prevent users from being able to download a significant quantity of files/folders if current device does not meet specific security requirements.

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  8. Device Trust: Microsoft SCEP AV

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  9. Support Sophos

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  10. Device Trust Hour/time of day Limitations

    Restrict time of day users are able to access Box with Device Trust. Our users should not be working hours that are not documented/billable.

    We have contractual and legal controls which put them at risk if employees are working outside of these hours.

    There may be larger demand for this due to the amount of security breaches that occur during odd/non-working hours.

    Time zone control would probably need to be included in this limitation.

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  11. Add computer password check in Device Trust check options

    Check to see whether the computer has a password set up to log in

    0 votes
    not planned  ·  0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  12. Remove Watermarking as an option under More Actions for customers who have not enabled this feature for their enterprise.

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  13. Allow customization for 30-day Period for Collaboration Invitation Expiration

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  jfan responded

    We believe our efforts are better spent making it easier to keep permissions up to date on folder vs. different expiry on collab invites.

  14. Please add "pfx" file type to supported certification type.

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  15. Need Device Trust to be supported in Windows Server

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  rbalakrishnan responded

    Only AV checks and FW checks will not work on Windows Server today. This is because the info we use to evaluate is not available on Servers (it is available on Windows Workstations).

    This enhancement is not planned for now, but we will investigate what will be required to support Windows Server in the future.

  16. Admin ability to clear external passwords for users

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  jfan responded

    This is not planned for the short-term roadmap. We will reconsider with additional customer demand.

  17. Restrict Co-owner's ability to invite additional Co-owners to a folder

    Currently, once a user is granted co-owner permission to a folder, they gain the ability to grant the same permission to other users.

    We would like an option that would only allow co-admins to grant permissions that are limited to editor and lower

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  jfan responded

    I don’t think we would necessarily do this.

    If you are a co-owner, we want you to be able to invite others up until your permission level.

  18. Revalidation of External Collaborators on a regular basis

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  nnathoo responded

    It would be great to get more insight into how you are thinking about this. For example:

    - Who would revalidates the user?
    - Does your company have an idea on how they’d like to revalidate users?
    - How often?
    - What is the current workaround (if any)?
    - How does this impact your use of Box today?

  19. Webapp Session Timeouts differently for Managed and External Collaborators

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

  20. Provide support SentinelOne as an antivirus on Mac (already supported on Windows).

    We are currently using SentinelOne as our corporate antivirus. Device Trust will recognize this as an Anti-virus when Box is used on Windows. However, Device Trust will not recognize the Mac version of the same software.

    0 votes
    0 comments  ·  Security  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    not planned  ·  jpeng responded

    For Windows, we can support any AV that Microsoft detects in Windows Security Center, which includes SentinelOne.

    For Mac, developing checks for each vendor is a separate effort where we need to both discover a way to detect if a vendor is being used and also re-test and maintain this code.

    Due to the resource-intensive nature, we will not be adding SentinelOne in the near future.

1 2 … 16 18 20
  • Don't see your idea?

Help shape the future of Box

Categories

Feedback and Knowledge Base

(thinking…)

By entering and viewing this page, you agree to be bound by (1) UserVoice Terms of Service and the (2) Box Community Terms of Use. In the event of a direct conflict between the foregoing terms of service with respect to the Box Community Guidelines, Feedback and Suggestions, the Box Community Terms of Use shall take precedence as between you and Box.