Skip to content

Help shape the future of Box

Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!

See user guide here.

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

179 results found

  1. Expansion of File Version Limit settings

    For customers currently using Governance, the "File Version Limit" setting can be set to 1-100 or unlimited.
    We would like this setting to be improved so that it can be specified as 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, etc. The reason is that problems may occur when there are multiple file versions when migrating between tenants or within a tenant, so I would like to limit this in the settings.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. Box Governance should be enabled for managed users

    We have observed that for Relay, there is an option titled "Relay enabled for all managed users." However, we couldn't find a similar option for Box Governance [tried with a co-admin privileged account].
    Moreover, we found that only for the co-admins, policies of using Box governance can be enabled.

    Our specific request is to have the functionality to enable Box Governance for all managed users (not only the admin/co-admins), allowing each user to utilize these features individually.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Revert a folder to a previous state in time, including its contents

    Revert a folder to a previous state in time, including its contents. Sorely missing feature, which has been need numerous times by my organization. Please add or risk defections...

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. Retention policy details in the Trash UI

    The Bin/Trash UI displays Retention policy details the first time you trash an item until you navigate away.
    Ability to have this info visible at all times in Trash UI would be helpful to end users and admin rather than running reports to check status of a single file.

    13 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Larger capacity and limit for exporting legal hold content

    Larger capacity and limit for exporting legal hold content

    Currently, only two legal hold contents can be exported at a time, and the maximum export size is 4TB.
    When there are many legal hold targets, the export setting needs to be repeated many times to download them, which takes a large amount of time.
    Therefore, we would like you to revise the maximum number of targets and capacity.

    現在、リーガルホールドコンテンツのエクスポートは1度に2つまでしか対象を指定出来ず、かつ容量が4TBまでとなっております。
    リーガルホールド対象が多いとダウンロードするために何度もエクスポート設定を繰り返す必要があり、時間が大量にかかります。
    そのため、対象と容量の上限を見直しして欲しい。

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. Regardless of the recycle bin deadline, legal holds are a priority

    Regardless of the recycle bin deadline, legal holds are a priority

    Under the current legal hold specification, the following contents are deleted from the recycle bin and become invisible even if a legal hold is applied when a deadline is set in the recycle bin.
    This is a very unfortunate specification, and we would like to see it improved so that legal holds are prioritized over recycle bin expiration dates and not deleted.

    ■Patterns that become invisible from the Recycle Bin
    Folders and files deleted before legal hold
    Folders/files deleted after legal hold

    現状のリーガルホールド仕様ではごみ箱に期限を設定しているとリーガルホールドをかけても下記コンテンツはごみ箱から削除され見えなくなってしまいます。
    これは非常に残念な仕様です、そのため、リーガルホールドが優先され削除されないように改善して欲しい。

    ■ごみ箱から見えなくなるパターン
    ・リーガルホールド前に削除されたフォルダ・ファイル
    ・リーガルホールド後に削除されたフォルダ

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Don't move or delete content with legal holds to a different folder

    Don't move or delete content with legal holds to a different folder

    The current specification is that content with a legal hold can be moved or deleted.
    However, this is undesirable in a situation where fraud has been clarified.
    Therefore, we would like to see an improvement so that it cannot be moved to another folder or deleted.

    リーガルホールドを設定したコンテンツを別フォルダへの移動や削除が出来ないようにして欲しい

    リーガルホールドを設定したコンテンツが現状は移動や削除可能な仕様になっています。
    しかし、不正が明確化した状況ではこれは望ましくないです。
    そのため、別フォルダへの移動や削除が出来ないように改善してほしい。

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. Additional versioning features

    Additional features regarding the version history:

    1. The ability to manually update the version number of a document on initial upload. This would allow existing version numbers to match version numbers tracked in Box.
    2. The ability to add the version number tracked in Box to the file name when downloading documents. This would eliminate the need to manually update the version number in file names, which could be prone to error.
    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Delete empty/orphaned parent folders.

    Please add the ability to delete empty parent folders that have reached a deletion threshold.

    Currently only the contents of the folders are deleted leaving an orphaned empty parent folder that have to be manually deleted.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. Delete User without transferring content when using Retention Policy

    【Background】
    When a Retention Policy is active and I try to delete a user that does not have a content that is under retention policy, it is required to transfer their content to another user.

    【Request】
    When the user that does not hold an item that is not under retention policy, I would like to have the user deleted without transferring their content.

    This is because we are currently using an ecosystem called Hakonnect, which manages users, but it returns an error when trying to delete a user with retention policy on.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. Ability for Legal Hold to notify user before they drop file in Trash

    Ability for Legal Hold to notify user before they drop file in Trash

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. Delete user without transferring content when using legal hold

    【Background】
    1. When "Legal Hold" is ON but no "Retention Policy" set
    2. When I try to delete a user that is not related to the legal hold above, they need to transfer the content to another user.

    【Request】
    Since it is a user that is not affected by the "Legal Hold", I would like to be able to use that user without transferring the content, which is the behaviour when there is no Governance setting.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. Option for only owners and co-owners to permanently delete content from trash

    This would include an option in the Admin Console > Enterprise Settings > Content & Sharing tab to allow only owners and co-owners to permanently delete content.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. Data Residency Zone in Netherlands

    We'd like a data residency zone in the Netherlands

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Allow Co-Admins to View Only Legal Holds

    I'd like to see a checkbox for Co-Admins to see only the Governance tab with only the Legal Holds sub-tab.

    Currently you can grant a Co-Admin permission to view and/or edit policies, which gets you close, but it also includes platform and retention policies at this time. It also inexplicably grants them access to a version of the Content tab I've never seen before.

    We have a whole department for managing legal holds and conflicts. They have no need to see the data, they just need to know the name of the person or folder that needs to be put…

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Merged  ·  0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Grant an admin access to all folders with one click.

    I would like a way to easily grant an admin access to all folders instead of having to add them to each root folder one by one.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. Retention Policy blocking trash

    Currently end users can move contents to trash even if it is under retention policy, I would like retention policy to also block users to send content to trash.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. Apply retention policy to both metadata and folder

    Currently you can only select metadata or folder when applying retention policy,
    I would like to set the retention policy up by applying both metadata and folder.
    This way I can restrict the specific content by narrowing down the files within the folder that has a specific metadata.

    3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Offer terms of service feature for shared links

    Allows a prompt to appear for external users to acknowledge confidentiality, currently exists if sharing a folder via direct email invite, but not when you copy a shared link.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. Signature on our Terms of Service / Box Sign

    We need a signature on our Terms of Service. It'd be great if Box Sign could be utilized on the TOS so that our users can draw their signature for it to please our oversight.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Governance  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
← Previous 1 3 4 5 8 9
  • Don't see your idea?

Feedback and Knowledge Base