Create Linux client for Box Drive

Thanks for your feedback. We unfortunately don’t have plans to support a Linux client for Box Drive at this time.
-
Anonymous commented
Without a proper Linux cli, Box feels like "File Sharing for Dummies":
- watered down
- featureless
- lame -
Anonymous commented
Just do it! The users of GNU/Linux grows everyday!
-
Anonymous commented
+1 Box drive/sync for Linux
-
Anonymous commented
Please ADD Linux client! Thank you very much
-
Anonymous commented
+1 on the need for a Linux client.
-
Anonymous commented
While we're not 'owed' an explanation why Box won't open up the world of Linux users (there's millions of us), it'd be nice if they provided one anyway. Is it lack of developer resources? Lack of domain knowledge? Financial decision? Technological constraint on how box works internally?
Also, have you considered a third party creating one for you? You could even make it a perk of your paying clients to have access.
Anyway, a response is appreciated.
-
Anonymous commented
Looking for an alternative to Dropbox, but, without Linux support, I cannot consider Box.
-
Anonymous commented
Three words: Dropbox does it. And apparently made the business decision that it was worth it to meet users where they are for different platforms.
-
Anonymous commented
With the number of requests for a Linux client and yet Box ignoring them I can only conclude Box's response (or rather, lack thereof) is financially driven with little regard for their users.
-
Anonymous commented
My only reason for using box is that my University provides it for us. As a long time Linux user, I strongly feel that the lack of support from the Box team for a Linux client makes this one of the worst cloud storage options for higher Ed. I will advocate strongly for my University to work with another cloud option unless Box come through with a Linux client. Higher ed is a big part of the business for box, and linux users are a substantial fraction of that community.
-
Anonymous commented
You have used Linux tools to develop Box, yet do not offer an easy client for Linux users. Nearly all academic institutions will have scores of people wanting this; and that is just one sector. Your previous stance on "demand not being adequate" is completely false.
-
Anonymous commented
Since Box has does not support Linux (because Microsoft won't let them, it seems), I can't use the product.
I have advised our IT department to search for a different cloud solution.
-
Anonymous commented
I was happy to hear that our university provides us with a Box account for cloud storage.
Then I found out that there is no Linux client. It seems that Box.com has been working on it for over three years, but nothing is happening. It seems like they actually don't want to do this.
So, I am not using my Box account and have sent an e-mail to our IT department advising them to change to another cloud storage solution.
-
Anonymous commented
Using Box with a Linux OS is such a pain.
I hate using box.
-
Anonymous commented
Seriously? No Ubuntu with Box? Crazy and not smart. Back to Dropbox for majority of my work. :(
-
Anonymous commented
Android Developer here with a Dell XPS15 with Ubuntu Linux out of the box (pun intended). I'd like to have an officially supported Linux client too to sync stuff between my work laptop and my home's desktop computer so I don't have to carry my laptop from one place to another. My company already has several Box licenses, but it seems I can't benefit from them properly because I use Linux.
I add my voice to this already highly demanded feature here (top #1).
-
Anonymous commented
I'd like this too.
-
Anonymous commented
A Linux client will much appreciated! Because webdav support is deprecate! :-(
-
Anonymous commented
Higher ed, physics department faculty. Box without Linux client support is a big disappointment and a glaring omission. Faculty, students, researchers, all kinds of people in my department use Linux on the desktop. But we can't use Box.
-
Anonymous commented
With no WebDAV and no native linux client, the only way for linux users to automate Box backups is with FTP or FTPS. But ftp(s) connections fail EVERY TIME for folders with more than a certain number of files in them. This is not an acceptable alternative for linux users, and it's wasting you bandwidth.
I would like to just send new files when I mirror my maildir folder on Box. But I cannot, because there are too many files to use lftp's mirror command; I get a "max-retries exceeded" just when sharing the list of files. So I have to tar up the whole darn folder and send that instead. I do that every day.
So every day there is no linux client, you are wasting about a gb of daily bandwidth from me alone. And that's because I'm nice, and restrict the collection to the past year. If I did all my email, I'd send 6gb every day.
If you are a Linux user, let's continue to send them this message. I can't even see how it's cost effective for them to continue this nonsense.