Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
108 results found
-
Box Hubs Analytics
Would be great to see metrics on how adopted our Hubs are. How many visits, which box users are visiting, how long each visit is, etc. Is this on the roadmap?
21 votes -
Increase collaboration invitation limit for Hubs beyond 500
Hubs owners/coowners can only invite 500 individual collaborators to a Hub. This poses a challenge for customers who have restrictive external collaboration settings that prevent the creation of public shared links, and need to provide access to external users via invitations to collaborate on files/folders. This limit needs to be increased (or eliminated) to support large enterprises with more restrictive security settings. Leveraging Groups is not a good alternative for users who primarily intend to use Hubs for external collaboration.
2 votes -
Improvement of search within the Hub
We would like to search for information within texts in the Hub, not only from files and folders in the Hub.
Currently, to enable information search within the Hub, we compile all information in Box Notes and add it to the Hub. However, this results in longer access times for users. We would like to improve the issue where supplementary texts written within pages are not searchable.2 votes -
We would like to see Box Hubs have a separate shared link permission setting
Currently, Hub shared links can be allowed from “Enterprise Setting” > “Content & Sharing”, but with the current settings, if Hub shared links are disabled, general folder and file shared links will also be restricted, which is very inconvenient.
Therefore, please consider making the shared link setting of the Hub independent, and allow shared links to be allowed for each individual Hub.【日本語】
現在Hubの共有リンクは、「管理コンソール」＞「コンテンツと共有」から許可できますが、現在の設定値ではHubの共有リンクを禁止すると、通常のフォルダとファイルの共有リンクにも制限がかかってしまい非常に不便です。
そのためHubの共有リンク設定を独立させ、Hub個別で共有リンクの許可を行えるよう検討をお願いします。11 votes -
Ability to exclude invitation restrictions in tenant settings in Hubs
We would like the ability to add folders with editor privileges in Hubs, even if only co-owners or higher can be invited in the tenant settings, so that it does not affect the invitation restrictions in the tenant settings.
Anticipate that many companies will not be able to change the invitation restrictions on the tenant side due to personnel issuances, security risk avoidance, etc.
Like to see this feature implemented, as it would improve the convenience of Hubs if there is a function to prevent tenant settings from affecting Hubs.テナント設定で共同所有者以上のみ招待可能な場合でも、Hubsでは編集者権限を持つフォルダを追加できるように、テナント設定の招待制限には影響しないようにする機能が欲しいです。
人事発令やセキュリティリスク回避等で、テナント側の招待制限を変更することができない企業は多い事が予想されます。
Hubsではテナント設定が影響しないようにする機能があれば、Hubsの利便性向上に繋がるかと思われますので本機能の実装を希望します。4 votes -
GitHub
Along with figma, YouTube, and box links can we also preview github links?
1 vote -
Hubs - Guest pinning or favourites
When Guests (certainly with a free account) are invited to Hubs, there is no easy access point for them to be able to go back to the hub. (its not in the left-hand navigation and/or does not show in recent and you can't add to favourites)
2 votes -
How to Prevent Content with Classification Labels from Being Published on Hubs
We want to set up a system so that if a user tries to publish a folder or file with a specific classification label to Hubs, a warning message will appear or an alert will be sent to administrators.
Within our company, we assign classification labels to content that is kept private except for specific users, and we are also careful when granting access permissions. However, if such content is published on Hubs, any user who can view the Hub will be able to access the content, which defeats the purpose. We want to be able to strictly manage the…4 votes -
Adding Font Colors
Please add gray as a font color option in Box Hubs, similar to Box Notes.
The gray color is very useful for representing supplemental information.2 votes -
Hide contributors on Box Hubs
Customers need the ability to hide who their published Hubs are shared with. They are sharing information with multiple customers who may be competitors of one another, and want to prevent them from seeing who else is accessing the information.
14 votes -
Add # of files to Box Hubs Report
Box Hubs fails if there are over 10,000 files linked to in the hub. It would be helpful to have a report that could report the total number of files available in a hub to help ensure we stay below this limit and/or if we exceed this limit, we can move content to a different hub and judge the impact of moving specific folders to better balance the load.
29 votesWe still plan to make this feature but it was deprioritized comparing to other features on our roadmap.
-
Box Hubs - Ability to Share Hub with All Managed Users
We have a number of Hubs that are geared towards providing information to all employees. As such, it would be great to be able to share a Hub with all managed users. In addition, it would be helpful to have the ability to share any file or folder with all managed users without having to create and manage and all users group or adding multiple groups to a file/folder to accomplish this.
36 votes -
Box Hubs: Allow search functionality within Box Hubs for users without Box accounts
Current functionality: If a user without a Box account access a Box Hub through a shared link, they do not see the search bar
Desired functionality: A user without a Box account accessing a Box Hub will still be able to use the search bar
Use Case: Using Box as a marketing DAM housing photos. A hub could be used to provide access to approved photos so that non-Box users can search for approved photos they need.
20 votes -
Streamline process for inviting free users to Hubs
If a customer has restricted users' ability to create public shared links, they can only invite external users to Hubs if they already have a Box account. It would be ideal if this process worked the same way as it does if you invite an external user to a file/folder, where they are prompted to create a Box account (free or otherwise) and can then view the Hub. This adds friction into the process for users that are leveraging Box for external collaboration.
1 vote -
Document Summarization via Mind Map and Audio
I’d like to suggest adding an option to summarize documents in the Box hub using a mind map format and audio, similar to what platforms like NotebookLM offer.
1 vote -
Use Box AI by selecting multiple files from Hubs search results
Customers want to implement an experience in Hub that allows them to select files from search results and use Box AI, just like the search function on Box.
Customer Needs:
Currently, if Box AI for Hubs does not provide the correct answer, they would like to select files from keyword search results and use Box AI.
Box上の検索機能のように検索結果からファイルを選択してBox AIを使う体験をHubでも実装することを顧客が希望しています。
顧客ニーズ:
現状、Box AI for Hubs で正しい回答が得られない場合、キーワード検索結果からファイルを選択してBox AIを使いたい3 votes -
Widget for tags in Hubs
In Hubs, it would be extremely useful to add a widget for tags, so that a list of tagged files could be shown/retrieved.
2 votes -
Hubs - Add ability to arrange sections horizontally
Will there eventually be an opportunity to arrange sections horizontally in the future? Thinking more like a canvas for a dashboard.
31 votes -
Allow adding external collaborators with edit permissions
Allow adding external collaborators with edit permissions
4 votes -
Give each Box Hub a “classification label” for the Shield function.
We want to give each box hub a “classification label” for the shield function. This would allow us to apply the shield function to each hub at once and prevent accidental external sharing.
各Box HubにShield機能の”分類ラベル”を付与したい。そうすることで、各Hubに一括でShield機能がカバー可能になり、誤った外部共有を防げます。
14 votes
- Don't see your idea?