416 results found

1. Attach files directly in Outlook (iOS/Android) with the Box for Outlook integration

   You should be able to use the native Outlook attach file option to add Box files into Outlook emails on iOS and Android.

   It seems like a real oversight to lock down Intune and block saving to OneDrive, locally on the phone etc. and then give users a terrible experience where they try and attach a file to an email and there's no available location to get files from and instead you have to go into Box first and share the link from there.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Add Nitro Pro integration to Box
   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. Adjust to Microsoft B2B Direct Connect

   We would like to operate Box as a single tenant for a tenant that has a Micoroft B2B direct connection.
   As Microsoft seems to be focusing on multi-tenant organization, I think it would be good to apply it as Box as well.

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Feature request to increase (or remove) the Box Graph Connector user limit

   I would like to see the Box Graph Connector user limit increased to 50,000.
   Or I would like to see the cap on the number of users removed.
   The user limit has been raised, but it's not enough for us.
   Please increase the limit on the number of users to 50,000 or remove the limit.

   There have been similar requests in the past.
   https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778-help-shape-the-future-of-box/suggestions/48201797-we-would-like-the-usage-standards-for-box-connecto

   【In Japanese】
   ＜タイトル＞
   Box Graph Connectorのユーザー数の上限を引き上げる（あるいは撤廃する）機能要望

   ＜本文＞
   Box Graph Connectorのユーザー数の上限を50,000へ引き上げる、または、ユーザー数の上限を撤廃してほしいです。
   ユーザー数の上限を50000へ引き上げるか、上限の撤廃をお願いします。

   過去に類似の要望がありました。
   https://pulse.box.com/forums/909778-help-shape-the-future-of-box/suggestions/48201797-we-would-like-the-usage-standards-for-box-connecto

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. box for slack:Image preview is not displayed in Slack Canvas

   When using the Box+Slack integration, if I paste an image into Slack Canvas, no preview is displayed, only the file name is displayed. This is different from Slack messages.
   Request:A preview of the image is displayed in Slack Canvas as well.

   •  

   24 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

6. Google and Microsoft FORMS integration is missing!

   I see that this is not planned based on lack of demand. I'm writing this comment to increase the demand.

   I will continue to use SharePoint or Google drive because this is missing from box.

   Word, PPT, Excel, Google docs, slides and sheets are all here... why not forms?

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Simplify access to box sign and match other vendors' capability

   Add box sign as an option in Microsoft Teams "Approvals" (just like Adobe, Docusign and Sharepoint have ;-) )

   •  

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Box for Netsuite - lock permissions for an accounting period
   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   1 comment  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

9. Enhanced Permissions for Locked Accounting Periods in Box for Netsuite Integration

   It would be helpful for the integration to change all permissions to Viewer for transactions in a locked accounting period. This would ensure data retention. I realize we could use "Viewer Uploader", however, accountants need delete permissions (i.e. "Editor") until the accounting period is closed.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Vote

   We’ll send you updates on this idea

   0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

10. The option to invite users as Editor when Box for Teams creates a Chat Folder

    Box for Teams currently invites users as co-owner in Chat folder which is too strong permission. Admin don't allow end-users to have any inviting permission in any other folders but it creates a backdoor when Box for Teams is enabled

    10 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Ability to disable channel folder changes by users (including team owners)

    Currently, users can change the location of their "Microsoft Teams Chat Files" folder and team owners can change the location of channels' folders.
    Due to security concerns, customers want to have the ability to disable folder changes for channels and chats.

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. Limit the federated search results to files under salesforce root folder

    Limit the federated search results to files under salesforce root folder.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

13. Airtable

    Security, sustainability, traceability and file management headaches would be significantly reduced if a file existed in one place, under a single corporate entity, with a single set of permissions and shared across integrations.

    It would be awesome if a file in Box could be published into an Airtable attachment field in an airtable record without copying it into the Airtable tenant and consuming storage.

    If a Box link were dragged into an Airtable attachment field and dropped, could Airtable interrogate the file permissions in Box to see if it is allowed? If so, present the thumbnail provided by Box as a preview. Click on the link, and it provides the Box preview as it does today and download capability. If the user's Box login could authenticate download, that would be amazing.

    Allowing the API to establish the link would be essential.

    Sustainability +++ Security +++ Ease of use +++

    Security, sustainability, traceability and file management headaches would be significantly reduced if a file existed in one place, under a single corporate entity, with a single set of permissions and shared across integrations.

    It would be awesome if a file in Box could be published into an Airtable attachment field in an airtable record without copying it into the Airtable tenant and consuming storage.

    If a Box link were dragged into an Airtable attachment field and dropped, could Airtable interrogate the file permissions in Box to see if it is allowed? If so, present the thumbnail provided by Box as… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Allow Co-Authoring to dynamically check document sync status

    Currently, if an Office document is opened before being synced to Box, the Co-Authoring features are unavailable. The document must be closed and re-opened to refresh the sync status.
    It would be good if the document could check it's sync status periodically while open and adapt on the fly.

    Seamless integration as Microsoft Teams collaboration

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Box for Teams Content Card Support for Group Invites

    We have confirmed that when collaborating as a group rather than as a direct collaborator, the content card behaves differently than described in the article.
    After investigating with your company (Box), we were told that content card behavior for group invitations is not currently supported.
    Therefore, to avoid confusion for users, we would like you to take the following action.

    　【Requests】：
    　　1.The article should clearly state that the operation of content cards for group invitations is not currently supported.
    　　2.In the future, we would like to see content cards for group invitations also be supported.

    　【Target article】：
    　　Using Box for Teams：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044681474

    　【Checked behavior】：
    　　1.Content card not updating even after granting access permissions

    　　　Article Contents：
    　　　　To Post a shared link from Box in a Teams Channel or Chat:
    　　　　5.Once you grant the access, the card refreshes to show the content card with file details.

    　　　Actual behavior：
    　　　　When attempting to grant access, the message "Response sent to app" is displayed, but the card is not updated and the card for granting permissions remains displayed.
    　　　　*It has been confirmed that the posted Box shared link itself can be sent to the other party and that the other party has received it.。

    　　2.Even if the same operation is performed, the number of inaccessible chat members displayed on the content card may differ.

    　　　Article Contents：
    　　　　Difference between Channels and Chats
    　　　　・When sharing a file in a chat message, Box indicates the specific number of chat members who lack access (it does not indicate this in a channel message).
    　　　　 By granting members access to the file, you are making them collaborators (as compared to channel members, to whom you’re simply granting file access).
    　　
    　　　Premise：
    　　　　・The sender, recipient A, and recipient B belong to the same group.
    　　　　・All three were invited to the shared link folder as part of a group, and were not direct collaborators.
    　　　　・The group has editor privileges

    　　　Actual behavior：
    　　　　・When the sender sends a chat to recipient A: The content card displays the message "You cannot view this file shared by two users."
    　　　　・When the sender sends a chat to recipient B: The content card displays the message "You can't view this file shared by a user."

    ＜Box for Teamsのグループ招待時のコンテンツカードのサポートについて＞
    直接的なコラボレータではなく、グループとしてコラボレートされている場合、コンテンツカードで記事と異なる動作を確認しております。
    貴社（Box社）に調査いただいたところ、グループ招待のコンテンツカードの動作は、現状サポートされていない旨回答いただきました。
    そこでユーザーの混乱を招かないよう、以下ご対応いただきたく存じます。

    　【依頼事項】：
    　　1.グループ招待のコンテンツカードの動作は、現状サポートされていないことを記事に明記
    　　2.将来的にグループ招待のコンテンツカードもサポート対象とする

    　【対象記事】：
    　　Box for Teamsの使用：https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044681474

    　【確認している動作】：
    　　1.アクセス権限を付与してもコンテンツカードが更新されない

    　　　記事の内容：
    　　　　TeamsチャネルまたはチャットでBoxから共有リンクを投稿するには:
    　　　　5.アクセス権限を付与すると、カードは更新され、ファイルの詳細を含むコンテンツカードが表示されます。

    　　　実際の動作：
    　　　　アクセス権限を付与しようとすると「応答がアプリに送信されました」と表示されるものの、
    　　　　カードは更新されず、権限付与するためのカードが表示され続けたままの状態となる。
    　　　　※投稿したBoxの共有リンク自体は、相手方に送信でき、相手方も受信できていることを確認済み。

    　　2.同じ操作にもかかわらず、コンテンツカードに表示されるアクセスできないチャットメンバー数に差異が生じる場合がある

    　　　記事の内容：
    　　　　チャネルとチャットの相違点
    　　　　・チャットメッセージでファイルを共有すると、アクセスできないチャットメンバーの具体的な数が表示されます (これは、チャネルメッセージでは表示されません)。
    　　　 　ファイルへのアクセスをメンバーに許可すると、そのメンバーはコラボレータになります (チャネルメンバーの場合は、ファイルへのアクセスを許可するだけです)。
    　　
    　　　前提：
    　　　　・送信者、送信先A、送信先Bは、同一グループに所属している
    　　　　・3名とも共有リンクのフォルダにはグループとして招待されており、直接的なコラボレータではない
    　　　　・グループとして編集者権限はある

    　　　実際の動作：
    　　　　・送信者⇒送信先Aにチャットを送信した場合：コンテンツカードに「2人のユーザーが共有したこのファイルを表示できません」と表示される。
    　　　　・送信者⇒送信先Bにチャットを送信した場合：コンテンツカードに「1人のユーザーが共有したこのファイルを表示できません」と表示される。

    We have confirmed that when collaborating as a group rather than as a direct collaborator, the content card behaves differently than described in the article.
    After investigating with your company (Box), we were told that content card behavior for group invitations is not currently supported.
    Therefore, to avoid confusion for users, we would like you to take the following action.

    　【Requests】：
    　　1.The article should clearly state that the operation of content cards for group invitations is not currently supported.
    　　2.In the future, we would like to see content cards for group invitations also be supported.

    　【Target article】：
    　　Using Box for… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Request for improvement of behavior when posting a shared link of a Box folder in a Teams channel or chat

    When you post a Box shared link in a Teams channel or chat, you'll see a Grant Access card with the option to grant users additional permissions if the following conditions are true:

    　condition：If there are channel members or chat members who do not have access permissions to the shared folder or file.
    　　　　　　＊This includes channel members and chat members who are invited as a group but not directly invited as users.

    The support article states that when you grant access, the card will update and a content card with file details will be displayed.
    However, when you post a shared link for a folder and grant access, although it says "A response has been sent to the app,"
    the card does not update and the card for granting permissions continues to be displayed.

    After investigating, we received a response from your company (Box) stating that the content of the support article only applies to files and that this is currently the expected behavior.
    However, in addition to files, shared links to folders are sometimes posted, and the current behavior is confusing to users.
    For this reason, we would like to see this improved so that the behavior for folders is the same as for files.

    　　＊Using Box for Teams：https://support.box.com/hc/en-us/articles/360044681474
    　　　「Posting a link from Box in a Teams Channel or Chat」
    　　　5.Once you grant the access, the card refreshes to show the content card with file details.

    ＜TeamsチャネルまたはチャットでBoxのフォルダの共有リンクを投稿した場合の動作改善依頼＞
    以下に該当する場合、TeamsチャネルまたはチャットでBoxの共有リンクを投稿すると、ユーザーに追加の権限を付与するためのオプションを含む、アクセス権限を付与するためのカードが表示されます。

    　条件：共有するフォルダまたはファイルへの、アクセス権限を持っていないチャネルメンバーやチャットメンバーがいる
    　　　　※グループとして招待されているものの、ユーザーとして直接招待されていないチャネルメンバーやチャットメンバーも含む
    　　　
    サポート記事では、アクセス権限を付与すると、カードは更新され、ファイルの詳細を含むコンテンツカードが表示される旨記載されています。
    しかし、フォルダの共有リンクを投稿し、アクセス権限を付与する操作を実施すると、「応答がアプリに送信されました」と表示されるものの、
    カードは更新されず、権限付与するためのカードが表示され続けたままの状態になります。

    調査の結果、貴社（Box社）より本動作について、サポート記事の内容はファイルのみが対象であり、現在の想定動作である旨返答いただいております。
    しかし、ファイルだけでなく、フォルダの共有リンクも投稿することがあり、現在の動作はユーザーの混乱を招いてしまいます。
    そのため、フォルダの場合もファイルと同じ動作となるよう、改善を希望いたします。

    　　＊Box for Teamsの使用：https://support.box.com/hc/ja/articles/360044681474
    　　　「TeamsチャネルまたはチャットでBoxのリンクを投稿する」
    　　　5.アクセス権限を付与すると、カードは更新され、ファイルの詳細を含むコンテンツカードが表示されます。

    When you post a Box shared link in a Teams channel or chat, you'll see a Grant Access card with the option to grant users additional permissions if the following conditions are true:

    　condition：If there are channel members or chat members who do not have access permissions to the shared folder or file.
    　　　　　　＊This includes channel members and chat members who are invited as a group but not directly invited as users.

    The support article states that when you grant access, the card will update and a content card with file details will be displayed.
    However, when you post a… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Expand a limitation of search result over 50 for Federated Search in Salesforce integration.

    Expand a limitation of search result over 50 for Federated Search in Salesforce integration.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. Please be able to specify which users can use the Box Graph Connector.

    Currently, the Box Graph Connector is enabled for users tenant-wide, but we would like to be able to enable it for specific users.

    For example, if some users are using Copilot for Microsoft 365, we need to be able to specify that only users who can use Copilot for M365 can use Box Graph Connector.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Provide Box plugin for Microsoft 365 Copilot

    Copilot plug-ins have the advantage that data can be handled in real time, and there are no limit to the number of items, etc.

    In addition to the Graph Connector, the Box plug-in for Copilot integration is also required.

    Appendix.

    https://learn.microsoft.com/ja-jp/microsoft-365-copilot/extensibility/

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Copilot support in Office Online/Office desktop applications for files on Box

    Currently, Copilot (Copilot in Word/Excel/PowerPoint) is not supported for Office files in Box.

    The following must be supported for files in Box

    (1) Copilot in Office Online

    (2) Copilot in Office desktop applications (with or without co-authoring)

    Appendix.

    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/i-am-getting-license-validation-errors-with-copilot-375cf342-8559-48c3-8436-7564d5de3fc6#:~:text=Check%20that%20your%20file%20is%20in%20the%20right%20location%C2%A0

    24 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Vote

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Partner Integrations  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close