Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
249 results found
-
Box Shield - Ability to "assign" alert to users
It would be beneficial to be able to assign a Shield Alert to a specific user / analyst / security team member, so they can review and analyze. This would simplify the process, and eliminate duplicate work as the security team do not work on the same alerts.
2 votes -
Ability to create custom Classification Label Data Types
Have the ability to create a custom classification label data type, e.g. to recognise a particular number format such as xxxxx-xx-***-xxxxxxx-x
This would enable us to classify documents containing particular account numbers or staff id numbers that don't match the current pre-built data types.
2 votes -
Box Shield to include volume Deletion actions as a Threat Detection Alert
Consideration to include high volume of deletion requests; delete at root level,; delete large number of files in a folder as an Anomalous Event within Shield Threat detection.
2 votes -
Feature request to be able to set the "Integration Restrictions" setting in Enterprise settings
I'd like to see the "Integration Download Limit" from the Enterprise Settings enforced tenant-wide. And I want it to apply to all content.
We would like to request the ability to set the "Integration Restrictions" setting from the Enterprise settings to the entire tenant.
Currently, in order to specify "Content download restriction on integrations", it must be applied every time a folder is created in the first level, and only restrictable content is applied.
I'd like to see the "Integration Restrictions" setting from Enterprise Settings enforced tenant-wide. And I want it to apply to all content.【In Japanese】
＜タイトル＞
「統合の制限」の設定をEnterprise設定にて設定できる機能要望…2 votes -
We would like to actively monitor the status of Box Shield and the Shield settings applied to our enterprise and environments.
We would like to actively monitor the status of Box Shield and the Shield settings applied to our enterprise and environments.
Doing so will provide the assurance needed that Box Shield is protecting us from threats, and mean we do not need to layer on our own file scanning as a backup.
2 votes -
Support 1 crowdstrike x multiple box tenants
Support 1 crowdstrike x multiple box tenants
2 votes -
Shared Link Expiration (Exception) Settings at Folder Level
I need to be able to control the shared link expiration rules at the folder level, especially when they are an exception from the enterprise-wise rule. We have a handful of use cases that fall outside of the top-line structure, and updating links 1-by-1 is added workflow time on the team. Changing for all assets under a folder would save time and impact when links expired by accident or stay live beyond desired timeline.
2 votes -
Scope of Access Policy Application
We request Shield Access Policy Settings to be applied in the external tenant.
[background]
The setting access policy in our tenant doesn`t apply to shared folders in external tenants.
We consider it is a risk to move folders or files incorrectly to shared folders in external tenants.2 votes -
Download and Print restriction policy and Office co-authoring
I have Office co-editing enabled on my device.
An error appears when I try to edit an Office file from a web browser that has the file labeled with "Download and Print Restrictions Access Policy for Box Desktop" enabled.
It's meant to be a label to disable BoxDrive, but I'm having trouble if I can't edit it from a web browser.
Please enable Office co-authoring from a web browser, even if the file is labeled with these restriction.
2 votes -
Box Shield Alert for Anomalous Deletion of Folders or Data
We would like an alert to be created if a user deletes an anomalous amount of data. We recently had an employee leave the company under bad terms and found that before we could let her go, she had deleted a bunch of folders from Box. We were able to recover them, but this would be an indicator (much like anomalous download alerts) that something is up with this employee and we should be digging in deeper.
2 votes -
Shield admin notifications to other admins when files are marked safe, etc
Interest in letting all Shield admins know when a file has been marked safe, useable, etc by another Shield admin
2 votes -
Allow admins to be able to exclude specific folders from scanning policies
Be able to safelist individual folders and their content, in case the latter are part of normal operational activities of specific teams, and to reduce false positives/noise to SecOps teams.
2 votes -
Shield Requests
Currently Box sheild has the capability to Scan only newly updated/created files or only if the existing file is modified. In simple terms the scan happens only for the newly created version of the files and not any existing files before Box shield is being implemented.
Feature request:
We need to have the option of Scanning all the files at rest & transit in Box irrespective of when it was created/ modified, etc so that it can detect any malware on already available files as well.
Currently Box only encrypts the file with a red banner on top if malware…
2 votes -
2 votes
-
Enhanced Auto Classification and File Criteria for All File Types in Box
We would like to have the ability to specify all file types in the file criteria for auto classification. Since there is currently no way to cascade classifications to all files excluding folders (categorizing confidential info on a file-by-file basis), I would like a feature where all files can be classified.
With the current individual extension specifications, it is not possible to use wildcard characters, so we would like to reduce the potential for information leakage due to intentional extension changes.
2 votes -
File criteria exclusion list for Box Shield classification policies
When setting up classification policies, Omnicell, Inc., would like to be able to create a list of custom terms to exclude, in addition to the existing ability to designate file criteria that will trigger application of a classification label. This would reduce the number of documents that will incorrectly have a classification applied when auto-classification is enabled. For example, Omnicell has a lot of content with dummy PHI in their environment - this content is allowed to be stored in Box and should not be classified; however, they also want to protect actual PHI that may be stored in Box,…
2 votes -
Display settings for classification labels
We would like to be able to temporarily not display (not disclose) classification labels within a tenant after they are created, but in that case, we need to delete all classification label settings, and it is time-consuming to set them each time, so we would like to be able to select whether to show or hide them.
2 votes -
Wish to improve the custom terms in the classification settings to include the string custom term + string in the search.
The following rules apply to custom terms in the classification settings:
[Reference]
Also, the characters surrounding any match must be of a different type (letters or digits) from the adjacent characters within the word. For example:if the policy looks for "Acme-Internal", the scan will match on "Acme Internal", "acme-internal", "Acme - Internal", "Acme (INTERNAL)", "Acme: Internal", "728Acme-Internal", "Acme - Internal728", "Acme-Internal-728", and so on, but not "Acme-Internalization", or "Acem-Internal".
if the policy looks for "AcmeInternal", the scan will match on "acmeinternal", "AcmeINTERNAL", "AcmeInternal4u", and so on, but not "Acme Internal", "Acme_Internal", "AcmenInternalization", "Acme"[Request]
Japanese is a language in…2 votes -
Shield Blocked Email Addresses (Not only Domains)
As of right now it is not possible to block a specific user with the external collaboration access policy restriction. This is only applicable for blocking domains. This request is to be able to add a specific user to the blocked list by email address.
2 votes -
Option to Display Warning Message to Users in Access Policy Monitoring Mode
It would be great to allow admins the option to display a "warning message" to users if they attempt an action that is in violation to the policy when the policy is in monitoring mode. Understanding that monitoring doesn't prevent the user from taking the action, it would still be a good tool for soft launching access policies if the option to display a message was available.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?