Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
217 results found
-
Control Outbound Collaboration in Box Shield
Box shield collaboration policies only seem to apply to inbound collaboration (i.e. sharing from one's own tenant to an external account). We need the ability to have fine-grained controls on what invites a managed user can accept from external tenants.
2 votes -
Ability to update/add definition of Virus/Malware
Ability to submit a malicious file so it can be added to the definition for Virus Scan feature.
2 votes -
Box Shield temporary user-level Suspicious Location exemptions (e.g. team member is traveling)
Box Shield temporary user-level Suspicious Location exemptions (e.g. team member is traveling)
2 votes -
Information barrier - Increase segments
Currently, Box ethical walls have a limit of 10 segments, Which needs to be increased. Many companies like us have more business units, Hence we need more segments to handle it.
2 votes -
Remove Approved Integration API as Suspicious in Shield Suspicious Location
Similar to the pulse below, I would like Shield Suspicious Location to not mark already integrated application IP address as suspicious because there are too many noise due to this.
2 votes -
I want to be able to set Relay triggers for folders as well.
Due to Relay specifications, only "files that triggered the flow" can be selected.
In our business, we want to copy uploaded folders to another folder automatically, but it is time-consuming to manually select the destination folder each time.
Therefore, we would like to be able to set triggers for folders.
(Japan)
Relayの仕様上、「フローをトリガーしたファイル」しか選択できない。
業務上、アップロードしたフォルダを自動的に別フォルダへコピーしたいが手動で毎回コピー先をフォルダを選択するため手間が掛かってしまいます。
そのためフォルダを対象にトリガー設定できるようにしたい。2 votes -
Enable default classification of MIP / Purview marked content from outside our tenant
We have multiple Microsoft Tenants and one Box EID. The challenge with this is that Shield only enables us to map sensitivity labels from one tenant. As a result we have a lot of information in our Box environment that is MIP marked but carries no Shield classification. It would be ideal to enable a default Shield classification for to be applied to data that has come from outside our MIP tenant. That way we can at notify users that additional controls may affect the document beyond those that Shield is enforcing, and smooth the gaps between our multi-tenancy in…
2 votes -
Enable option with Shield Access Policy to break hard coded waterfall permissions (e.g. Editor --> View)
Enable option with Shield Access Policy to break hard coded waterfall permissions (e.g. Editor --> View).
E.g. everybody who is not the owner of the content previously was an Editor, but after I overlay a "View Only" Access Policy and Classification Label to the content, then everyone who is not the Owner of the content is View Only.
2 votes -
Enable ability to use metadata as a trigger for Classification Tags for Box Shield
Enable ability to use metadata as a trigger for Classification Tags for Box Shield
2 votes -
Limit applying a classification label to a specific user group
I want to be able to limit the permission on a particular classification label. I have a class label that I want only a specific user group to be able to apply. There is an approval process in place (via Box Relay) for labeling content with the specific class label, and I don't want my users to be able to use that label without going through the approval process or limit it so only the admin group can apply the class label. Thanks!
2 votes -
Uploading restrictions for folders to which Box Shield's "External Collaborator Restrictions" are applied
We would like to be able to restrict users from uploading files and folders to folders to which BoxShield's "External Collaborator Restrictions" have been applied by dragging and dropping them into the browser.
By granting users the authority to edit and prohibiting uploads, it will be possible to more clearly distinguish between file management and access authority management, and allow editing while maintaining a level of security.(In Japanese)
BoxShieldの「外部コラボレータ制限」を適用しているフォルダに、ブラウザへのドラッグ＆ドロップでファイル・フォルダをアップロードすることを制限できるようにしてほしいです。
ユーザーに編集する権限を付与し、アップロードを禁止する事でファイル管理及びアクセス権限の管理をより明確に区別し、セキュリティレベルを保ちつつ編集を可能とする事が可能になると考えられます。2 votes -
BOX SHIELD - Block all applications from downloading content
The following feature is redundant:
Block all applications from downloading content - No integrated applications (except Microsoft Office for the web, Google Workspace, Apple iWork, and Adobe Acrobat Online) or published custom applications will be able to download content protected by the access policy.
I thought the purpose of Box Shield was to protect organizations from data breaches????
We have configured everything within our box account to prevent certain data from being download or printed. However, Box gives our users the option to open these confidential files in Adobe Acrobat which then allows them to download, print, and anything else…
2 votes -
Can we get another pop-up screen when Deleting a Shield Access policy to make sure that is the action the admin wants to take?
The 'Delete' and the 'Edit' button are right next to each other on the Shield Access Policy page. When clicking 'Delete' the policy automatically deletes. It is easy to accidentally click instead of 'Edit'. Can we get a second window that asks if that is the action the Admin/ Co-Admin wants to take on the policy?
2 votes -
Automatically classify content based off uploader
Automatically classify content based off uploader of document. Use case: anything a legal team member uploads should automatically be classified as confidential
2 votes -
Auto classification of files/folders based on metadata and comments
It would be helpful if Box's auto classification feature were able to trigger file classification (and thus, security controls) if metadata on a file/folder is sensitive in nature or if a file has comments/tasks/annotations that contain sensitive information.
2 votes -
Add a Birthdate / Birth date infotype to Automated Classification
Birthday is not an an InfoType in automated classification. Please add this field.
2 votes -
Add ability to allowlist unpublished apps in a Shield list or Access Policy
Currently, the only apps that can be exempt from an Access Policy are published apps or custom JWT apps that have been approved in the Admin Console. There is a gap for unpublished OAuth apps that may need to be allowlisted from a policy.
2 votes -
File Security Classification, non-compliance label
When viewing a folder, it is currently not possible to know if there are files within the folder structure that have a differing classification label from the one at the root level. This "non-compliance" could potentially be problematic, or even a signal that someone has inadvertently changed a classification. It would be nice to have some kind of visual indicator that the top-level classification label is not 100% cascaded throughout the folder/file structure below it in the waterfall.
2 votes -
Box Shield
Can we have more granular on the detection rules, e,g, down to user groups, or individual account level - allowing customers to set priorities as high for some user groups, but low for others. For some users, a customer may expect high levels of downloads/activity in Box and this may be in peaks and troughs - therefore potentially a lower priority, whereas with execs this activity should be treated as a higher priority and greater risk.
2 votes -
Visibility and controls on externally owned content
Box admins should be able to restrict their users from uploading or moving sensitive content to folders that are owned by another Box instance. There should be controls around what defines sensitive content. Box admins should have visibility into what's uploaded or moved into the external folders in reports.
2 votes
- Don't see your idea?