Help shape the future of Box
Welcome to Box Pulse, our product feedback tool powered by UserVoice. Got an idea for how to improve Box? Share it with us and gather support or vote on other people's ideas. Your feedback is essential to informing roadmap decisions and shaping the future of our products. Thanks for joining our community!
See user guide here.
209 results found
-
Support 1 crowdstrike x multiple box tenants
Support 1 crowdstrike x multiple box tenants
2 votes -
Customize Shield Malicious Content Banner
Customize the red header banner on files flagged via the Shield Malicious Content rule to support UX and change management, e.g., be able to add text like "Please contact help@customer.com for support".
1 vote -
Ability to identify password protected files(パスワード付きファイルを特定する機能)
If a file is password protected, Box Shield's deep scan cannot be performed.
We would like to see a feature added to Box Shield to identify files with passwords.(和訳)
ファイルにパスワードが掛かっていると、Box Shieldのディープスキャンが実行できません。
パスワード付きファイルを特定するためにBox Shieldに、パスワード付きファイルを特定する機能の追加を希望します。3 votes -
Box Classification Settings: provide ability to restrict modifications to Admins and Co-Admins
Currently, Box Classification configuration allows you to restrict classification modifications to Owner, Co-Owner, Editor, and Viewer Uploader. We would like to add Admin and Co-Admin to this list. Thank you!
1 vote -
Microsoft AIP and Box Shield integration
We would like to have MS AIP label added automatically after applying a certain Box Shield label to a content inside of Box.
2 votes -
Shared Link Expiration (Exception) Settings at Folder Level
I need to be able to control the shared link expiration rules at the folder level, especially when they are an exception from the enterprise-wise rule. We have a handful of use cases that fall outside of the top-line structure, and updating links 1-by-1 is added workflow time on the team. Changing for all assets under a folder would save time and impact when links expired by accident or stay live beyond desired timeline.
2 votes -
Scope of Access Policy Application
We request Shield Access Policy Settings to be applied in the external tenant.
[background]
The setting access policy in our tenant doesn`t apply to shared folders in external tenants.
We consider it is a risk to move folders or files incorrectly to shared folders in external tenants.2 votes -
Geo Restricts for External Collaborators
Implement a Shield Geo-fencing control that would disable access to Box folders for External Collabs when they try to access Box content from abroad.
8 votes -
Require Co-Admin privileges to change a Shield Classification Label
Require a user to have Co-Admin privileges in order to change an existing classification label. This is to prevent even Owners the ability to change the classification label to a lower security level once it's been set.
11 votes -
Shield Classification UI option should gray out when user does not have permissions to update classification
If the user does not have access to classify content, they should not get this option to change the classification in shield.
1 vote -
Information Barriers Segment Report
Add an Admin Console report that can easily show which users are within Information Barrier segments. or add information barriers to the current User Details report. The current User Details report does not pull any values from the Information Barriers segments.
1 vote -
As so many deep scan alerts, we can't find alerts detected only by reputation scans quickly.
Add the ability to search for alerts detected only by reputation scans.
3 votes -
Request: Rich Shield dashboard
Request for Shield Dash board
The information of the graphs is so simple.
Could you make the rich insight?
For example, whne the targeted user who caused anomalous download started downloading a lot f contents, how much increased #s of DL day by day, Week by week etc.Currently we need to export user activity report if we want to know more. so rich insight will be helpful for Box admin.
2 votesThe Box Shield Product team is researching the ask.
-
Sheild > [Download and Print Restriction], if "For Box Desktop" is enabled, the Office co-editing function should be available via a browser
Sheild > [Download and Print Restriction], if "For Box Desktop" is enabled, the Office co-editing function should be available via a browser.
We have applied Box Shield's [Download and Print Restriction] to "For Box Desktop" and [Microsoft Office Coauthoring Basics] via browser is also disabled.
Microsoft Office Coauthoring Basics] via a browser is also disabled.
Similarly, Office co-editing functions that are opened via a browser should not be restricted, since access in BoxEdit is not restricted.
Errors in opening the file in the browser cause confusion for the user.
Also, please add the following explanation to the Access Policy Settings…29 votes -
Download and Print restriction policy and Office co-authoring
I have Office co-editing enabled on my device.
An error appears when I try to edit an Office file from a web browser that has the file labeled with "Download and Print Restrictions Access Policy for Box Desktop" enabled.
It's meant to be a label to disable BoxDrive, but I'm having trouble if I can't edit it from a web browser.
Please enable Office co-authoring from a web browser, even if the file is labeled with these restriction.
1 vote -
Box Shield Alert for Anomalous Deletion of Folders or Data
We would like an alert to be created if a user deletes an anomalous amount of data. We recently had an employee leave the company under bad terms and found that before we could let her go, she had deleted a bunch of folders from Box. We were able to recover them, but this would be an indicator (much like anomalous download alerts) that something is up with this employee and we should be digging in deeper.
2 votes -
Ability to provide feedback on anomalous download alerts
I would like the ability to provide user-level feedback on anomalous download alerts. Today, you can only provide feedback via the folder and suggest whether or not it contains sensitive information. It would be better if you could provide this feedback at the user level - if someone is on a specific team, they may be expected to download a lot of files from a specific folder. However, that behavior might be anomalous for another user on a different team. I also find that these alerts are often triggered for new users who are not actually downloading an unusual amount…
3 votes -
Shield admin notifications to other admins when files are marked safe, etc
Interest in letting all Shield admins know when a file has been marked safe, useable, etc by another Shield admin
2 votes -
Allow admins to be able to exclude specific folders from scanning policies
Be able to safelist individual folders and their content, in case the latter are part of normal operational activities of specific teams, and to reduce false positives/noise to SecOps teams.
2 votes -
Allows the report to see the classification labels that have been applied in the past
In the User Activity Report, when a classification label is changed, it is logged. However, it does not record from which label was changed to which label..
One user currently sets the privilege to edit classification labels to editors (general employees). However, the more users with editing privileges, the greater the security risk. The only way to avoid this risk is to limit the scope of editing privileges to the owner or co-owner (superior). In that case, it would be too inconvenient, since it would be necessary to apply to the superior for a change in the classification label.
By…5 votes
- Don't see your idea?